> Message posted by Myles Power <myles@shaw.ca>: > > I would like to preface my question by suggesting that we don't turn > this > into a debate about whether or not I should be producing at 192. But > if you > feel the need to comment on this, then > > Ok, I won't pretend to know which sample rate is best for projects intended for CD (16/44.1) delivery, but in the latest issue of Resolution magazine there's an interview with the principals of Prism Audio, (makers of ultra- high-end converters), and they say it's better to record at 44.1, and use no down sampling, for such projects. Archiving and/or intended delivery to high-res formats is of course better using the relevant higher rate. HTH, YMMV, Peace, Ed Billeaud Snowflake Studio P.O. Box 7637 Breckenridge, CO 80424 970-453-6830 edva@earthlink.net http://www.soundclick.com/edbilleaud

Yes i realize that 44.1 is best for cd. I was talking more in terms of output to my monitors for more accurate monitoring. Would this make for more 'accurate' monitoring? I am asking because i simply do not know. I am still very much in the learning stage.