jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 98 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Dave Whyte" <dwhyte@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 at 10:14:27 AM
Subject: Win 2000
Message #241
Has anyone had any experience with beta 3 win2K. I have everything working in my machine except my AW8 card which doesnt let me configure the driver with any of the Emagic drivers from disk, website etc. Any help or suggestions would be very welcome. Thanks, Dave Whyte
Viewed 400 times, 4 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Michael Lauer <emulator@xxxxxxx.xxx
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 at 2:33:06 PM
Subject: Re: Win 2000
Message #516
This is a reply to #241.
> From: "Dave Whyte" <dwhyte@g...> > Has anyone had any experience with beta 3 win2K. I have everything working > in my machine except my AW8 card which doesnt let me configure the driver > with any of the Emagic drivers from disk, website etc. Any help or > suggestions would be very welcome. > Thanks, Dave Whyte No chance - it simply doesn't work yet - as well as Logic... which is sad, because the latest version (Win2000 RC1) is the most stable version of WinNT I have ever worked with... including NT 3.51... ! But let's see... it's only a few months until release date. I belive Emagic will soon have a W2K version ready. -- Regards & Gruesse from Mickey @ http://www.Vanille.de --------------------------------------------------------- How could anyone know me - when I don't even know myself ?
Viewed 368 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@xxxx.xxx
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 at 3:57:19 PM
Subject: Re: Win 2000
Message #520
This is a reply to #241.
> No chance - it simply doesn't work yet - as well as Logic... which > is sad, because the latest version (Win2000 RC1) is the most stable > version of WinNT I have ever worked with... including NT 3.51... ! > But I've seen some reports of people already working with Logic Platimnum on win 2000 (not AW8). I'm searching were I found the information and will transmit it to this page !!! Regards, hans
Viewed 364 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@f...>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 at 4:11:19 PM
Subject: Win 2000
Message #1070
This is a reply to #241.
Hi, I'm really disapointed of the service here from Emagic (FRANCE) Normally I had to receive the soft ( Logic Audio) a week ago, but the salesman hadn't receive anything at all. Today , he said me that it would be impossible to have it before two or for weeks !!!!!! This is because of the importer here in FRANCE (IML) that doesn't support Emagic from now on, there will be an other importer in a few weeks "$$¤Âà ‚¤Ã‚¤***%Ã&acir c;€šÃ‚£ " As I commanded a school version (wich is less expensive, and as a teacher I may ..) the only way to get a version is to get it from Germany directly (and a bit more expensive than the school version). What's the price of the Platinum version in USA ??? As I prefer an English version ... maybe I can Command it in the USA ? I did tests with Samplitude and Cakewalk under win 2000 For Samplitude I didn't had any problems at all, and had a really big setup (over 60 mono tracks !!!!!!!!!!!!! with two PIII450's) and with Cakewalk, there were a lot of bugs !!!!! Normaly this has to work with Logic I think and I really hope I will receive my version next week... regards, Hans
Viewed 349 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: AietaD@xxx.xxx
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 at 7:09:12 AM
Subject: Re: Win 2000
Message #1108
This is a reply to #241.
I payed $499.00 + shipping from Emagic in California. It was an upgrade from micrologic. Regards Jules
Viewed 368 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.