jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 97694 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Andrew Hunt <andy@toolshed.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 at 6:46:30 PM
Subject: [LUG] Best way to wire this up? (aux/bus/etc)
Message #219559
Hi all, This is probably a simple matter, but since I'm not very wise in the ways of bus + aux interaction, let me ask you the following: I want to wire up an audio input such that I can have one audio object that feeds two different tracks: one where it's compressed and dry, and the second where it's uncompressed and fed through a reverb. I can do it after the fact by copying the audio region to a second track, but I'd like to set this up to work in realtime. At first I thought I could simply create two tracks pointed to the same audio object, but that doesn't seem to allow me to have different channel strip settings. So what is the canonical way to wire up this sort of deal? thanks in advance, / dy
Viewed 240 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Peter Ostry <po@ostry.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 at 5:15:09 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Best way to wire this up? (aux/bus/etc)
Message #219567
This is a reply to #219559.
On 08.10.2006, at 01:46, Andrew Hunt wrote: > I want to wire up an audio input such that I can have one audio > object that feeds two different tracks: one where it's compressed and > dry, and the second where it's uncompressed and fed through a > reverb. I can do it after the fact by copying the audio region to a > second track, but I'd like to set this up to work in realtime. For realtime use you can take two Aux objects and set their inputs to the same Logic input. For mixing you could do the same if you route the audio track to a bus and use Aux objects with that bus as source. But here you might prefer Bus instead of Aux because of Logic's solo problem with Auxes. Insert two sends in the audio track, each to one bus. Check carefully what happens if your audio track is stereo. No problems with mono tracks. ___ Peter Ostry
Viewed 234 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Andrew Hunt <andy@toolshed.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 at 8:23:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Best way to wire this up? (aux/bus/etc)
Message #219569
This is a reply to #219567.
On Oct 8, 2006, at 6:15 AM, Peter Ostry wrote: > > Insert two sends in the audio track, each to one bus. Check carefully > what happens if your audio track is stereo. No problems with mono > tracks. So just to clarify: The audio track would have two sends on the inserts, and no output itself. One bus would have a compressor insert, the other would have the reverb insert. And don' mess with no auxes :-) thanks. / dy
Viewed 214 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Peter Ostry <po@ostry.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 at 3:12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Best way to wire this up? (aux/bus/etc)
Message #219575
This is a reply to #219569.
>> On Oct 8, 2006, at 6:15 AM, Peter Ostry wrote: >> Insert two sends in the audio track, each to one bus. Check carefully >> what happens if your audio track is stereo. No problems with mono >> tracks. > > On 08.10.2006, at 15:23, Andrew Hunt wrote: > So just to clarify: > > The audio track would have two sends on the inserts, and no output > itself. > One bus would have a compressor insert, the other would have the > reverb insert. > > And don' mess with no auxes :-) Exactly. ___ Peter Ostry
Viewed 238 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.