Sorry to hijack this thread but a (for me) a more serious issue is the bug in bouncing offline. This was mentioned in this thread a few days ago. I did some phase cancelling tests with both on & off line bounces and yes in tracks with considerable cpu usage there is stuff that is being missed in the offline bounces, it doesn't seem to be so prevalent with less complex tracks. Anyone??? Keith Moore Lone Arranger Pty. Ltd. Musicians don't retire; they stop when there's no more music in them. Louis Armstrong (1901-1971) _ _ _ ............... www.lonearranger.com.au

On Oct 1, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > I did some phase cancelling tests with both on & off line > bounces and yes in tracks with considerable cpu usage there is stuff > that is being missed in the offline bounces, it doesn't seem to be so > prevalent with less complex tracks. Anyone??? > Have you ensured that two successive bounces of the same type yield complete cancellation? There may be some randomness factor in something that may prevent identical results in any case. This is worth verifying first.