|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Maybe I'm naive, but I still find it hard to believe that there is a
significantly large group of people out there _using_ (not just having
possession of a pile of software) pirated software on a large scale in their
music production endeavors (for example, relying day in and day out on a
pirated version of LAP as their main sequencer).
I'm all for software engineers and companies doing what they need to do to
protect the products that they work long and hard to produce, but I just
wish they would take a little more care and put a little more thought toward
the experiences of the end (legal) user. Withholding PDF versions of manuals
seems extreme to me. Many other companies use the opportunity to provide PDF
manuals to non-users as a way to convince them of the quality, power, and
features of their product, in addition to providing an easy and efficient
way of distributing manuals to paying customers. Emagic seems a bit paranoid
in this regard.
I guess the bottom line for me is this: software companies will _never_ be
able to completely prevent piracy, so perhaps it is time that they realize
this and ease up on the practice of pursuing measures of copy protection
that result in aggravation, disappointment, inconvenience, and even product
failures for their paying customers.
Mike P.
AFAIK(not very far) Logic 4.0 Has not been cracked by anybody remotely
reliable.
They may crack it. So I throw in with EMagic on their marketing
decision to not provide a PDF manual.
STOP THE PRESSES! What is really needed is a good index. It's not as
if the present manuals are indecipherable, it's that you cannot quickly
find anything until you finally learn the jargon. A real index for a
program so deep would compensate for that by anticipating the
probability that, if you had MIDI timing problems, you might, perhaps
naively, look under Timing or MIDI timing. Predictably, neither of these
stabs will lead you anywhere in the present manual. There will be no
cross reference to Unitor or any of the myriad things that might give
you a timing delay. Still, some clue is probably in the manual. You
simply need to rifle through it for 45-145 minutes to remember it's
structure and there it is:CTRL-ALT-BENDOVER. A professional index at
least says see this or that.
The architypical problem is for new users to want to change the audio
record length. What would you look under? Record length? Nothing.
Recording? Options? A bunch of useful stuff about autodrop, cycle
mode, replace mode, etc. but not what you really need to know. I have
had to look it up before and I still haven't the slightest idea where it
is in the manual. The path was slightly changed in WAP4 and I can find
it more easily now by instinct but c'mon......
On computers, indexing is so easy. All you need is someone with a
sympathetic mindset and the ability to say you're going to have to add
another x number of pages to your manual. And them pay them to do it.
If you are going to release a big manual without a good
cross-indexing, and I reiterate, this is the most important part of any
complete reference, my advice to you, if I may echo Marcus' clipped
phrase: "discussion on this topic is useless". We, your public
will not
like it.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |