Cubase looks like a toy. like tetris, only tetris worked better and was more fun. Logic is slicker, though there is always room for improvement. justin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gilles Ruppert" <denise.ruppert@...> To: <logic-users@onelist.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [LUG] Logic v. Cubase (In Future Music mag) > From: Gilles Ruppert <denise.ruppert@...> > > Quite right. I prefer waiting some time to get rewire instead of having > an unstable version. > Cheers, > Gilles > P.S: I prefer LA graphics to Cubase's (don't like the windows cube style > ;-) > > f-erenc szabo wrote: > > > From: zerobeat@... (f-erenc szabo) > > > > I wrote, quoting the FM review: > > > > > >> Cubase ... > > >> ... for incorporating certain technologies (VST, Rewire etc) > > >> before Logic. > > > > Markus Fritze responds: > > > > > >Well, _this_ is not our fault. > > > > Of course! But I think this is your fault completely: > > > > >Logic...... more stable and professional, > > >and for better quality of final results. > > > > By the way, professionals *only* want stability, compared > > to rushed features that don't work right. Cubase has instant > > gratification compared to Logic: Nicer graphics(?), easier to > > use, very flashy ads, more claim of modern features like VST, > > Rewire, better price. But the alert shopper almost always chooses > > Logic (at least where I'm from) after realizing the long-term > > ramifications. Good timing will never be a passing fad!!!!!!!!!! > > > > f-erenc > > "Fix signs"