|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
I hope this post doesnt get filtered out. I think its important. I finally
got my logic 7 pro
two days ago and it is awesome!!! I say don't get discouraged because for
about two
months I would read all these post and ,honestly, I was scared of getting
logic 7 because it
seems all i read was about problems I never even dreamed about when
considering a
recording program.
Anyway I finally decided to get it and got ready for a big pain in the butt
installation with
trying to configure stuff that should be done manually. Also I heard this
was the hardest
program to learn and it wasnt very intuitive and stuff like that. You guys
out there read the
same things as me ,you know what i am talking about. All that stuff was
opposite for me...
I installed it and was playing with the soft synths in about 30 minutes. No
problems or
crazy things happening, just a killer looking and sounding program.
I will say this there is alot to learn about the program because there is
alot of features to
the program. learning Logic 7 doesnt seem bad. I thought I was going to be
going crazy
trying to do basic stuff. Something I learned about all this digital program
stuff, for me is ,
if you learn basic funtions of one you just have to find where the functions
are on the
other. I mean I learn midi editing and working with sequencers from reason
2.5 and alot is
the same, to me..
So, IMHO, dont be like me and be scared of this program because it is a
awesome and
creative pallette to make music. this program where take you where you need
to go. It will
work with you on what ever level you are on.
> I hope this post doesnt get filtered out. I think its important.
No posts are "filtered out." The moderators will step in on
occasion
but even then you would be notified that your post was not forwarded on
to the list.
Brian
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Logic Audio Pro 7.0.0
PowerMac G4 933MHz
OS X 10.3.7
1 GB RAM
MOTU 828mkII
- driver v1.09
- CueMix v1.4
> So, IMHO, dont be like me and be scared of this program
> because it is a awesome and creative pallette to make music.
> this program where take you where you need to go. It will
> work with you on what ever level you are on.
Yes, Logic *is* an awesome program. Congratulations on your purchase!
However, certain parts of the program *are* far more difficult to
setup/configure than the competing programs. For me, this is especially true
with respect to setting up sound modules. Once you get things setup though,
Logic has a plethora of features that make it a wonderful tool.
I hope that Apple will (and actually feel confident that they will) update
some of these areas of the program to bring them more up-to-date with the
competitors.
A few areas of Logic that need updating because they currently make the
program more difficult to use than the competitors...
Setup of Sound Modules and Synths: "Multi instruments" are very
outdated.
Menu System: Mac programs are supposed to have *one* menu bar, not one for
each window. Unless, of course, Apple prefers the "Windows"
approach to
menus. ;) In addition, the menus on the individual windows are smaller and
more difficult to click with the mouse and there is no "keyboard"
way to
access them that I know of.
Help System: Context sensitive help for complex dialogs like the Transformer
dialog are desperately needed. The competitors have "Help" buttons
on most
dialogs.
"Kamm Schreiner" <kamm@...> writes:
>Menu System: Mac programs are supposed to have *one*
>menu bar, not one for each window. Unless, of course, Apple
>prefers the "Windows" approach to menus.
However, Logic Windows didn't have this good method of
having local menus per window. Certain global menus would
stay constantly (as Logic Mac's global menus) but then certain
other global menus would change depending on which window
was topped. I didn't like this. Among other things, it meant
that you couldn't access a local menu in a window without first
topping it. In Logic Mac, you can access an untopped window's
local menu (or any other part of the window) without topping it
by using the long-click method.
There are also many other Mac programs with local menus. It
makes perfect sense.... have commands available that only make
sense in a particular window. ProTools and Digital Performer
certainly do this.
Certain rules that were written in a vacuum make sense to break
in actual practice. For example, there's an Apple rule which states
that the mouse can never be moved by the software (only by the
user). This means that when you click on a large flip-menu, and
the current selection is way off to one extreme, the mouse stays
still but the menu can be partially offscreen. The other (much
more sensible) method is to have the menu open up fully onscreen
but have the mouse pointer move towards the current selection.
f-erenc szabo, smarty pants
Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T
"NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!"
<http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
> However, Logic Windows didn't have this good method of having
> local menus per window. Certain global menus would stay
> constantly (as Logic Mac's global menus) but then certain
> other global menus would change depending on which window was
> topped. I didn't like this. Among other things, it meant
> that you couldn't access a local menu in a window without
> first topping it. In Logic Mac, you can access an untopped
> window's local menu (or any other part of the window) without
> topping it by using the long-click method.
As with most things, one size doesn't fit all. We will have to agree to
disagree on this.
I still think that Apple should stick with their guidelines and personally
think it would improve the program. The menu bar would simply change to
match whichever window is currently active. That certainly would not cause
any confusion. For me, it would alleviate some confusion.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet that the menus will eventually get changed
to match Apple guidelines now that it is an Apple product. Only time will
tell... ;)
Kamm
I completely agree. When I picked up Logic 6 about a year ago, I was
terrified after all I had
read about it. Indeed, the first time I booted it up (after using Live 3 for
several months) I
was intimidated......But once I figured out how to get it configured (which
took me several
hours) I explored Logic by using those features which were most readily
accessible. It took
about ten minutes to figure out how to load software instruments, how to set
up cycle
mode recording, how to cut and paste tracks, how to use plug-ins, etc.
Now, one year later and with Logic Pro 7 (which I think is slightly easier
to use) I am still
using the same basic skills that I learned in those first few sessions. I
haven't encountered
many of the problems that advanced users do simply because I am not at their
level. I
haven't bothered with using the Environment or many of the sophisticated
customization
techniques. But for my purposes, exploring the incredible soft synths and
plug ins, making
simple (8-16 track) recordings, compiling CD's for friends, I can still use
Logic at a
reasonably basic level and derive great benefit from it. I mean I don't even
use key
commands (except to change patches) or customized window set-ups. I have a
few start-
up templates configured and then I play and record my music.
I booted up Audio Desk (which came with my MOTU 828mkII) and it was no more
or less
complicated than Logic. It took a few hours to get oriented.
Obviously experienced DAW users and the many pros who contribute to this
forum have
great insights about the strengths and weaknesses of Logic Pro. I learn a
great deal about
the program just by following this and other forums.
My point is to reinforce the original post......don't be put off by the
reputation of Logic as
impenetrable. It just takes a bit of effort and concentration to get going
(several hours)
and then there's an incredible amount you can explore without even worrying
about some
of the advanced features. At the same time, you have great depths of
possibilities to
explore when you want to take on additional challenges.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Kamm Schreiner"
<kamm@s...> wrote:
> The menu bar would simply change to
> match whichever window is currently active. That certainly would not
> cause any confusion. For me, it would alleviate some confusion.
For me, it would be a major major pain in the arse. I frequently use
the menus in background windows, or in floating windows, which cannot
be made active...
John Pitcairn
-------------------------------------------------------------
Logic Control emulation for generic midi controllers:
LC Xmu demo: http://www.opuslocus.com/lcxmu/
-------------------------------------------------------------
John Pitcairn wrote:
> For me, it would be a major major pain in the arse. I frequently use
> the menus in background windows, or in floating windows, which cannot
> be made active...
Btw, is that an OS based thing?
This seriously is one of the most annoying things for me when working with
LogicPro.
Being used to Windows' behaviour I'm used to "active" float
windows (with
working keycommands) as well. In a floating Matrix I can just select a note
and press backspace to delete it while under Logic/Mac the
"parent" sequence
will get deleted.
This is a true PITA!
- Sascha
> For me, it would be a major major pain in the arse. I
> frequently use the menus in background windows, or in
> floating windows, which cannot be made active...
You use menus in background windows??? Exactly how do you click on that menu
with the window in the background? Once you click on that menu, it is not
longer a background window. Right?
Kamm
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |