In a message dated 11/2/04 9:31:31 AM, zerobeat@... writes: > If your ears and perceptions are fine tuned enough to appreciate the > difference between a mediocre piano and a great piano, then an > mp3 is a lousy way to judge such distinctions.  An mp3 specifically > makes things sound a bit glassy and tinny and "electronic".  Ear fatigue > sets in quicker with mp3s.  It's like trying to appreciate Modogliani, > Rembrandt, Picasso or Tanguay from a blown up polaroid. Thanks. That said, which of the three or four have you heard in the studio and which is the most "natural"?