> ** Original Message follows... > From: John <realkuhl@...> > Subject: Re: EXS on nodes > > > This is too bad, especially because the exclusion seems to be dictated > > not at all by any sort of technical limit, but in order to avoid > > "violation" of sample licenses (such as the VSL). Surely a better > > solution for everyone would be for the licenses to be augmented to > > include uses such as these, rather than ham-stringing creative > > development. (Make the lawyers work for you, instead of crippling our > > tools to bend to them!) > > Excuse me, Paul, > > What do you mean by "violation" ?? It is a clear illegal situation to allow > EXS to work on multiple computers using the same library. It is also clearly a beneficial situation for the creative process to allo EXS to work on multiple computers using the same library. So let's see.. if I have multiple Akai S3000s or Emulators it's not a problem for them to share a common library, but if I have multiple EXS' on different computers it is???? > I don't see enough > residual money due to the illegal copying of my CDROMS already - I'm also a sample CD producer and I can't say when was the last time I saw decent residuals, but still... "Surely a better solution for everyone would be for the licenses to be augmented to include uses such as these, rather than ham-stringing creative development." I agree 100%!!!! Peace, Mars