|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
-I would like to be able to perform editing on each channel separately
on an interleaved stereo file. I can do this with split stereo files by
disconnecting them. At least provide for a simple workaround; the
ability to convert back and forth between split and interleaved stereo.
-I would like to see bigger "process" buttons in
"Factory",
particularly in "Time Machine" please. And also an additional
detune
scale with fixed increments of 10 cents.
Some more for the wish list /H
On Sunday, May 2, 2004, at 20:52 Pacific/Auckland, esp wrote:
> -I would like to be able to perform editing on each channel separately
> on an interleaved stereo file. I can do this with split stereo files by
> disconnecting them. At least provide for a simple workaround; the
> ability to convert back and forth between split and interleaved stereo.
And also, do we need those annoying dialogs every time we
disconnect/reconnect stereo files? "The stereo file has been
disconnected. Please choose 'Reconnect stereo files' to reconnect".
AND... "The stereo files have been reconnected". When you're
disconnecting/reconnecting a bunch of files this gets mighty tedious.
And why not a batch convert option anyway?
Ian
------------------------------
Ian G. Morris - Tonewright
ian@...
www.igmusic.co.nz
> On Sunday, May 2, 2004, at 20:52 Pacific/Auckland, esp wrote:
>> -I would like to be able to perform editing on each channel
separately
>> on an interleaved stereo file. I can do this with split stereo
files by
>> disconnecting them. At least provide for a simple workaround; the
>> ability to convert back and forth between split and interleaved
>> stereo.
2004-05-03 kl. 06.15 skrev knee:
> And also, do we need those annoying dialogs every time we
> disconnect/reconnect stereo files? "The stereo file has been
> disconnected. Please choose 'Reconnect stereo files' to
reconnect".
> AND... "The stereo files have been reconnected". When you're
> disconnecting/reconnecting a bunch of files this gets mighty tedious.
> And why not a batch convert option anyway?
Totally agree!! /H
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |