jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 77886 of 105815 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: R/T <cowudders@...>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 at 4:48:47 PM
Subject: Re: the future of bouncing/voodoo
Message #160666
> From: Remco Muntz <rmuntz@...> >> The MIO Console Application has 80 bit resolution and thanks to the >> sterling efforts of BJ and his team much better code implementation >> than >> Logic: more accurate math=less denigration >> when summing = better sounding result. [Logics out's set to unity >> gain] >> Also, The converters/internal circuitry of the 2882/ULN-2 give >> stunning >> results for monitoring (Software monitoring in Logic disabled so using >> Metric Halo's driver [also an improvement IMO]) which gives a more >> accurate impression of what you 'have' which, for me, leads to better >> mix decisions. >> > > Can anyone tell if it's better sounding than the RME Hammerfall DSP? I > think the RME sounds great as well, but am very interested in the > Metric Halo. Maybe my next audio interface... The MetricHalo DSP vs. the RME Totalmix? Hmm ..... no idea. don't hear any difference in the 'summing' (can't hear this word anymore :) The convertors and analog design of the MetricHalo interfaces (2882, ULN-2) is completely great! Might seem a bit expensive first, but worth it. I have an ULN-2 sitting here and it's my volume knob feeding my monitors (great D/A!), my micpre (with features and sound that's really too good for this price range), my digitalinterface, ... etc... I think about adding a second ULN or the 2882 for location recording. http://www.mhlabs.com/ cheers, bernd
Viewed 1775 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.