>From: Peter Duemmler <dixie@...> > >Just my opinion and experience (to end this thread! or reply privately, >please): > >With Windoze any machine is shit to me. >I don´t need that crazy CPU-horsepower you have - I have a TDM system (I >can do 64 audio tracks and the Mac reacts as quickly as with only one >audio track). All this is running on 2 18GB Cheetahs connected to an >Adaptec 2940UW, and I never had any disk problems. >And the Mac-OS is very easy to maintain, which Windoze is not. >Even IE and Outlook (Express) are better as Mac-versions IMO. > >Not to mention the lot of friends I have who all have silly >Windoze-probs which I have to deal with to keep their systems up and >running. Amen to ya, brother. What's this? Another mine is bigger than yours thing again. Mac, MacOS, Intel, AMD, Windows, Linux, BeOS, who cares. If one suites ya, use it. The fact that IE and Outlook run better on MacOS is due to the fact that Windows users get all the crap of bells and whistles M$ puts in there. Now if they would put something in there like Altivec..., hmmm :-), Yoonchi. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ¥ððn©hí "Change has always come from small minorities." Robert Fripp, 1980 http://go.to/yoonchi http://noten.nl.fortunecity.com/jazz/8/ http://victorian.fortunecity.com/pinter/438/ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@