|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
<Admin - we have stopped using the [LAM] header>
In Digest 7012, William Menz drew up a detailed proposal for a dedicated
piece of audio hardware he calls the AU1, which he hopes Emagic will
manufacture. As his ideas are too long to quote, I urge you to read the
original.
In a nutshell, he believes that Macs are so inherently crash-prone when
dealing with digital audio that he proposes moving the entire function, dsp
processing included, to a separate standalone unit that would be
well-integrated into Logic.
Superficially, at least, it sounds a lot like a Digidesign's TDM in an
expansion chassis--hardly a crash-proof system, particularly when used with
Logic. Of course, the AU1 might have the advantage of being designed by the
same company that makes the computer OS. And the audio engine itself would,
presumably, be in the external unit which might reduce potential conflicts.
(There would still have to be some kind of internal audio software--but it
could be very simple.)
So, William, why do you think this would work better than Digi's system?
(And thanks for all the deep thinking!)
Michael Levine
www.MichaelLevineMusic.com
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |