|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Brand new. And nice. Better than anything I have. (Logic's built-in
comp, trackplug, Reaktor4 stuff, floorfish). On vocals, that is.
Limiter is OK too.
Can anyone check it against Waves RenComp/UAD compressor stuff?
Might make a nice groupbuy.
www.sonalksis.com
Cheers,
Zip
> Brand new. And nice. Better than anything I have. (Logic's
> built-in comp, trackplug, Reaktor4 stuff, floorfish). On
> vocals, that is.
> Limiter is OK too.
> Can anyone check it against Waves RenComp/UAD compressor stuff?
My 2 cents: Different to Waves RC (better for some sources, less good for
others), not as good as UAD for vintage emulations, but then it's not trying
to emulate a specific device. Interface is quite complex, which means it's
harder to get good results quickly, but more flexible than some other
devices as a result.
The Limiter is necessary because I find the comp' alone misses a lot of
quick transients. Autorelease function is ok, but not as good as other
implementations of Autorelease I've heard, and not suitable for a lot of
material.
I like it and bought it, but as a tool for specific scenarios, rather than
an all round, all purpose compressor.
Just my view.
>Brand new. And nice. Better than anything I have. (Logic's built-in
>comp, trackplug, Reaktor4 stuff, floorfish). On vocals, that is.
>Limiter is OK too.
>Can anyone check it against Waves RenComp/UAD compressor stuff?
My initial impression after using very briefly is that in broad terms
it is nicer than everything but the UAD-1 plugs which still rule.
>Might make a nice groupbuy.
I'd be very up for that because it would be nice to have have
something I can use on busses and live inputs and I can't do that
with my UAD-1 Plugs because of the latency.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |