Hi, I think thats the great part of Logic, each 1 can adapt himself the way of working he/she likes... I don't think it matters if u do it on separate tracks... (talking from my expirience) Shmulik Kovalsky Musician Look at The Jerusalem Jazz Band Home Page: http://sky.aquanet.co.il/jjb/ -----Original Message----- From: Gisle Martens Meyer <gislemm@...> To: 'logic-users@onelist.com' <logic-users@onelist.com> Date: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:24 PM Subject: [LUG] Optimal track use in arrange (MIDI only) >From: Gisle Martens Meyer <gislemm@...> > >Hello, > >I have a performance question. I'm only using Logic for >MIDI, LAWP, but I don't think that matters for the answer. > >What is the most efficient way to arrange MIDI data on tracks? >The way I usually work is to have maybe 4 tracks pr MIDI channel >in arrange, one track for the notes, one for CC07 volume, one for pan, >one for modulation etc etc. Well its the way I work, don't ask :) >I can quickly zoom in on the pan track and hyperdraw my changes. > >However, is this efficient for the Logic MIDI engine? Or should I >compress everything onto one track pr midi channel, so Logic don't >have to analyze umpteen tracks before sending out data? > >Or is it the opposite way around: The more data on a track, the >slower goes Logic? > >It'd be great if someone knew this. > > >Thanks, Gisle