|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
My new Motu Soundcart is able to handle 24 bits and up to 96 Khz. I have
drums recorded at 24 bits and 44.1 Khz
To my ears recordings at 96 Khz sound better.
Does it make sense to record my other tracks (vocals, guitars etc) at 96 Khz
and convert the drumtracks also to 96 KHz?
I can't find this in the FAQ. If it is, please mail me.
greetings,
Evert
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Evert Scholten
<evertscholten@w...> wrote:
> My new Motu Soundcart is able to handle 24 bits and up to 96 Khz. I
have
> drums recorded at 24 bits and 44.1 Khz
> To my ears recordings at 96 Khz sound better.
> Does it make sense to record my other tracks (vocals, guitars etc) at
96 Khz
> and convert the drumtracks also to 96 KHz?
>
> I can't find this in the FAQ. If it is, please mail me.
>
> greetings,
>
> Evert
Hi Evert,
I guess so.Although the drum tracks will NOT sound any better,because
upsampling
does not add any new audio info,just numbers.
I would suggest playing the drumtracks out through an analog desk into
tape,or
another recorder,and re-recording them but at 96kHz.That way you could try
to make
them a little better with outboard EQ,and you would not just be adding ones
and
zeroes to your files.
I must say I still record at 24 bit 44.1kHz,and if you are only going to CD
quality or
lower like mp3 as your final delivery format,then the extra 96kHz is not
going to
make much of a difference to the end listener.It will get lost in the
downsampling/
dithering.
I Hope this helps,
Nick
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |