|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Sorry can't find any info on Emagic Sites - my sytem is a Dual 2Ghz G5.
Thanks
On Dec 2, 2003, at 2:12 PM, reaverle wrote:
> Sorry can't find any info on Emagic Sites - my sytem is a Dual 2Ghz G5.
Seems to utilize them well. However, for effects plugins you have to do
a trick to get them to be thrown onto the second processor. I think
it's something like insert an I/O, make sure it has an Input and Output
set (not just the default "---", then disable it. This causes the
plugins (and maybe virtual instruments?) on that track to be thrown to
the second processor.
On 02.12.2003, at 20:12, reaverle wrote:
> Sorry can't find any info on Emagic Sites - my sytem is a Dual 2Ghz G5.
Then you should see a dual cpu meter if you click "System
Performance"
in the Audio Menu. "Audio" means cpu in the window that opens.
Best
Ray
-------
Raymund Beyer
http://www.brainstorm-music.com
Wayne Folta on 3/12/03 8:33 AM, Wayne Folta at wfolta@... wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2003, at 2:12 PM, reaverle wrote:
>> Sorry can't find any info on Emagic Sites - my sytem is a Dual 2Ghz
G5.
>
> Seems to utilize them well. However, for effects plugins you have to do
> a trick to get them to be thrown onto the second processor. I think
> it's something like insert an I/O, make sure it has an Input and Output
> set (not just the default "---", then disable it. This causes
the
> plugins (and maybe virtual instruments?) on that track to be thrown to
> the second processor.
The above info only apples to OS 9.x.x If you're on a G5 then that means you
must be working in OSX so none of the above apply AFAIK. CPU load
distribution is handled by the OS in X so Logic works as good or bad as any
other program in the same OS.
--
==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/=
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
http://www.jaminajar.com.au
On Dec 2, 2003, at 7:28 PM, Paul Najar wrote:
> The above info only apples to OS 9.x.x If you're on a G5 then that
> means you
> must be working in OSX so none of the above apply AFAIK. CPU load
> distribution is handled by the OS in X so Logic works as good or bad
> as any
> other program in the same OS.
Hmmm... you're right. I was getting the wrong impression from Logic's
Audio CPU load meters, which rarely stay balanced.
Looking at it more closely, it appears that it does put different
instruments, etc, on the two "CPUs", though it almost looks like
the
assignment is done once and then as different combinations play, the
load becomes unbalanced.
BUT, watching the Apple CPU meter indicates that things are very evenly
balanced. So either Logic's meters are misleading, or maybe MacOS X is
throwing other tasks (screen updates, etc) onto the processor that
Logic has least loaded, balancing things out in the end.
> On Dec 2, 2003, at 7:28 PM, Paul Najar wrote:
>
>> The above info only apples to OS 9.x.x If you're on a G5 then that
>> means you
>> must be working in OSX so none of the above apply AFAIK. CPU load
>> distribution is handled by the OS in X so Logic works as good or
bad
>> as any
>> other program in the same OS.
Sorry Paul this is not quite right: the early 6.x versions handled
those both cpu's similar to OS 9. The load of course was swapped over
both of them, but you couldn't get the same out of the cpu that OS 9
gave with the I/O plug-in trick.
AFAIR v6.1 of LPX Logic changed it's behaviour (it was in the release
notes as well), making full use of both cpu's under certain
circumstances (sometimes requiring to select an AI in the AR). Since
this version the performance of Logic is similar to what we got in OS 9
will all the tricks (I/O, Rewire). For some reason many users didn't
notice this change, even if it gave about 30-80% more available power
depending on what you do, compared to the previous versions.
Further, the G5 can balance the load between the the cpu's much better
than the G4's, that's one reason why they are even more performant
compared to clock speed.
Best
Ray
-------
Raymund Beyer
http://www.brainstorm-music.com
Raymund Beyer on 4/12/03 7:30 AM, Raymund Beyer at lists@... wrote:
> Further, the G5 can balance the load between the the cpu's much better
> than the G4's, that's one reason why they are even more performant
> compared to clock speed.
Thanks for the clarification Ray. I've not yet enlisted OS X for primetime
here although I'm starting to experiment in it....
--
==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/=
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
http://www.jaminajar.com.au
Raymund Beyer wrote:
> AFAIR v6.1 of LPX Logic changed it's behaviour (it was in the release
> notes as well), making full use of both cpu's under certain
> circumstances (sometimes requiring to select an AI in the AR). Since
> this version the performance of Logic is similar to what we got in OS 9
> will all the tricks (I/O, Rewire). For some reason many users didn't
> notice this change, even if it gave about 30-80% more available power
> depending on what you do, compared to the previous versions.
>
> Further, the G5 can balance the load between the the cpu's much better
> than the G4's, that's one reason why they are even more performant
> compared to clock speed.
>
> Best
>
> Ray
Hello RAY,
If you can avoid to use abbreviation (AR AI LPX) it will be more readable
for foreign people on the list. Thanks in advance.
Concerning the I/O helper in OS X, it does not seem to be able to do load
balancing anymore, may be I do not set it properly ?
I made a trial to move the Inputs to the second CPU did not work
I think I also did a trial with an EXS24 instrument too a few weeks ago,
same result !
Best regards
Cyril Blanc
France
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |