> Yes, the FAQ update is long overdue -- sorry about that. The point > is that it's become a kind of one-man project, and I simply haven't > had the time to do anything about it lately (a.o. new job -- lots of > fun, but consuming approx. all my time & energy). As a consequence I > also haven't really paid much attention to the LUG lately, which > means I surely have missed items that should be included in the FAQ. > I do have quite a few saved posts which wait to be included, but I'm > afraid lots of FAQ-material is missing nonetheless. Well done Hendrik for what you did so far! Many thanks, it is very useful. A FAQ is one thing, but with so many different Logic updates do you think that a definitive list of known bugs & issues would help this list? If we could all agree what is a BUG, what is an ISSUE of course... ;) You dont want to have FAQs about BUGs, do you? As a newbie to Logic my biggest problem is working out if my problem is: a) me b) the interface c) the hardware d) the OS e) Logic f) digital voodoo weirdnessess g) none of the above If I knew which it *might* be then I would know to wait for eMagic to fix a bug, or return to the manual to fix my knowledge and thereby save bandwidth Lu

On a fine day, 02-12-2003, rdfe wrote: > > Yes, the FAQ update is long overdue -- sorry about that. The point >> is that it's become a kind of one-man project, and I simply haven't >> had the time to do anything about it lately (a.o. new job -- lots of >> fun, but consuming approx. all my time & energy). As a consequence I >> also haven't really paid much attention to the LUG lately, which >> means I surely have missed items that should be included in the FAQ. >> I do have quite a few saved posts which wait to be included, but I'm > > afraid lots of FAQ-material is missing nonetheless. > >Well done Hendrik for what you did so far! Many thanks, it is very useful. Thanks :) >A FAQ is one thing, but with so many different Logic updates do you think >that a definitive list of known bugs & issues would help this list? If we >could all agree what is a BUG, what is an ISSUE of course... ;) You dont >want to have FAQs about BUGs, do you? That's exactly the problem. Quite a few people call something a bug while actually it's their personal preference that something worked other than it does (or it's their lack of reading the manual, etc). And then there's the real bugs -- but these change from update to update, and since there's so many updates (relatively), I wonder if a bug-list would ever be complete or not-outdated or ... And there's also the problem of many bugs/problems being very hardware specific -- Logic 5 with interface X has behaviour A, while Logic 6 with the same audio interface has behaviour B, but then interface Y with Logic 6 _does_ again have behaviour A, except when you adjust some setting in the interface's control panel upon which you see behaviour C, etc, etc. >As a newbie to Logic my biggest problem is working out if my problem is: > a) me Always a good guess :-) > f) digital voodoo weirdnessess Another good guess... >If I knew which it *might* be then I would know to wait for eMagic to fix a >bug, or return to the manual to fix my knowledge and thereby save bandwidth Waiting for Emagic to fix a bug can be a long wait... -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra h @ k n o w a r e . n l Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com/