jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 74595 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Matt McKenzie-Smith <mattrixx@...>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 at 5:10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Adjust Object Length to Locators problem?
Message #151245
> I am experiencing a problem with the "Adjust Object Length to > Locators" command. > With some audio files or regions, the command does not properly > time-stretch the audio. snip Yeah, I find that it seems to depend on different algorithms. I can't remember off hand which ones do and don't work. Also, just to add to the list of probs. I am the only person who tries to make extremely short loops of audio? I have to use the command, turn loops to copies, to enable to playback. This has been around since version 5, maybe even earlier. I cannot remember for sure. Cheers, Matt _________________________________________ Matt McKenzie-Smith PO Box 10395 Adelaide 5000 South Australia +61416 197 883
Viewed 202 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Zenon Marko <z_marko@...>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 at 11:26:07 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: [LAM] Adjust Object Length to Locators problem?
Message #151280
This is a reply to #151245.
Ciao, A follow-up on my own query. One (admittedly inelegant) solution is to simply apply the same command again to the resulting file. So far, this seems to result in an accurately stretched object. This solution is not ideal, as presumably each stretch degrades the audio quality to a certain degree. Best, 3
Viewed 190 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Paul Levine" <Paul_Levine@...>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 at 2:29:38 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: [LAM] Adjust Object Length to Locators problem?
Message #151300
This is a reply to #151280.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Zenon Marko <z_marko@e...> wrote: > One (admittedly inelegant) solution is to simply apply the same > command again to the resulting file. > So far, this seems to result in an accurately stretched object. > > This solution is not ideal, as presumably each stretch degrades the > audio quality to a certain degree. Zenon, Could it be that in applying this command, you are asking that the audio be stretched beyond the maximum amount the digital factory will let you stretch it? There is a maximum amount you can stretch audio in one pass. Subsequent passes will, as you said, degrade audio even further. I haven't fooled around with the settings to see if any of them give you a larger maximum. If I really need to stretch audio a lot, I'll use Peak, (which sounds OK) or Soundhack (if I want that granular "windowing" kind of effect. If it's a matter of getting a rhythmic loop in time as well as in key, I find I get the best results by using classic transposition (sampler style, in fact, sometimes I use the EXS24 to tweak the loop into time) and then to use free transposition to pitch the loop into the right key. This preserves the rhythmic feel a little better than time stretching, at least to my ears. Paul
Viewed 176 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.