jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 74542 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Kris Northern" <logic@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 12:31:57 AM
Subject: [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151126
Hi there... Is there any plugin out there that can do realtime timestretching? if there isnt is there any hardware that does this? secondly I really want to learn how to isolate say, a vocal from other elements in a wav or aif file... I talked with a friend about it once and have a rough idea of how this works but no clue on how to actually do it. thanks! kris Kris Northern Sound Design / Graphic Design www.phidelity.com
Viewed 1166 times, 2 replies, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?christian obermaier?= <christianobermaier@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 3:07:38 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151131
This is a reply to #151126.
> Is there any plugin out there that can do realtime timestretching? Uh, like you sing in a mic and the end of the line is already out before you sang it ? No, wait. You sing and the end of the sentence comes out five seconds later ? But because you flipped the thing on half an hour ago, everything will come out five hours late ? No, i don't get it. Please explain. > how to isolate say, a vocal from other > elements in a wav or aif file... You can't, really. Christian ________________________________________________________________________ Download Yahoo! Messenger now for a chance to win Live At Knebworth DVDs http://www.yahoo.co.uk/robbiewilliams
Viewed 1107 times, 1 reply, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "lakeplacidblue" <lakeplacidblue@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 10:43:36 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151161
This is a reply to #151131.
----- Original Message ----- From: "christian obermaier" <christianobermaier@...> > > > how to isolate say, a vocal from other > > elements in a wav or aif file... > > You can't, really. > > Christian Sorry this may be Off Topic stuff .......but Any ideas Christian on how they did the 'Nat King Cole' and Natalie Cole track together all those years ago now ............
Viewed 1022 times, 1 reply, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Raymund Beyer <lists@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 3:55:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151183
This is a reply to #151126.
On 01.12.2003, at 07:31, Kris Northern wrote: > secondly I really want to learn how to isolate say, a vocal from other > elements in a wav or aif file... I talked with a friend about it once > and > have a rough idea of how this works but no clue on how to actually do > it. There is only one software that can do this: Pandora from Prosoniq. Unfortunaately it was never released, only the Realtime version called Pandora Realtime. It is a Sonic Works plug-in and with it you could increase or decrease the loadness of the voice by about +-10 dB. http://www.macmusic.org/softs/view.php/lang/EN/id/449/ Best Ray ------- Raymund Beyer http://www.brainstorm-music.com
Viewed 1023 times, 0 replies, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: <christianobermaier@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 4:08:15 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151188
This is a reply to #151161.
> Any ideas Christian on how they did the 'Nat King Cole' and Natalie Cole > track together > all those years ago now ............ I'm afraid i can't be of much help, cause i only faintly remember that song, which i assume is due to me having been not too impressed at the time. Sorry. There's a technique to *remove* vocals and everything else that's in the center of a stereo recording, involving phase reversing of one side and then summing both channels to mono (your mixer does the math), but you can't apply it backwards to remove everything but the vocals. And it doesn't work on mono sources anyway. Christian
Viewed 1006 times, 2 replies, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Sonny Keyes" <sonnykeyes@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 7:38:54 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151198
This is a reply to #151188.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, <christianobermaier@y...> wrote: > > Any ideas Christian on how they did the 'Nat King Cole' and Natalie Cole > > track together > > all those years ago now ............ > > There's a technique to *remove* vocals and everything else that's in the > center of a stereo recording, involving phase reversing of one side and then > summing both channels to mono (your mixer does the math), but you can't > apply it backwards to remove everything but the vocals. ...Although theoretically if you had a perfect file of the vocal- free backing track and you phase-subtracted it from the original you would end up with only the removed vocal... Sonny Keyes SKa Music Toronto
Viewed 1008 times, 1 reply, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "lakeplacidblue" <lakeplacidblue@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 8:34:05 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151216
This is a reply to #151188.
Christian wrote .. > which i assume is due to me having been not too impressed at the time. > Sorry. > > There's a technique to *remove* vocals and everything else that's in the > center of a stereo recording, Yes I know this - However, the Nat King Cole / Nat Cole - was very very clever though I just wondered how they may have achieved such a good result. Anyone else got any ideas ?
Viewed 1003 times, 0 replies, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "christianobermaier" <christianobermaier@...>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 at 12:35:28 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] time stretch plugins and vocal isolation
Message #151228
This is a reply to #151198.
> theoretically if you had a perfect file of the vocal- > free backing track and you phase-subtracted it from the original you > would end up with only the removed vocal... Theoretically, yes. That is, if the signal has never left the digital domain and there has been no mix bus compression been involved, which would make the instruments behave differently with/without vocals. Christian
Viewed 976 times, 0 replies, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.