|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Marius
Have you tried a RAID Set up ?
Amar
At 22:25 01/12/1999 , you wrote:
>From: marius de vries <marius@...>
>
> > Joeri Vankeirsbilck <joeri@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyway, you wanted a track count. Well, I just tried to make some
audio
> tracks that
> > were playing the same audiofile. I first wanted to check the load
of
> the CPU etc and
> > not the harddisk. So, I made tracks... and tracks... and tracks...
> until I had used
> > all 64 audio STEREO tracks... all playing the same file. No
phasing,
> just the same
> > sound... much louder of course (had to put the master at -50
dB)... and
> the system
> > performance meter showed this: Audio: 20%, harddisk 1%... The
harddisk
> was of course
> > just 1% since I simply copied the same file to all tracks... but
the audio
> > performance surprised me: 20% with 64 stereo tracks... not bad...
> especially since
> > the system still felt as fast and fresh as it was playing 1
audiotrack.
> Is this test
> > correct? I mean: 20% is wonderful, but is it because I was only
using 1
> stereo
> > audiofile for all the 64 stereotracks? Could anyone with a
different
> system (Mac or
> > PC or whatever...) confirm/compare ?
>
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Joeri
> > --
> > Joeri Vankeirsbilck
> > joeri@...
>
>
>I've just installed a new LAM system, B+W G3 (400 mhz), 2x888, ATTO SCSI
>card, 4 x 16gig cheetah drives in a Glyph Hotswap chassis.
>
>Running a similar test to the above, laying out 64 *different* audio
>tracks, I am unable to get more than 28 mono tracks (26 with cycle
>enabled) playing simultaneously before I get a
>"Disc-too-slow-or-fragmented" error message. My 9600-based
system does
>much better.....
>
>DAE buffer is set to 2, other buffer settings appear to have little
impact
>on this problem.
>All four Cheetahs are attached to one of the ATTO ports. I know I'd
>probably be doing better to split them, but I'm thinking I should be
able
>to get better performance in this configuration - I've run 48+ tracks
off
>one drive before - and I'd rather keep it like this if possible.
>All discs freshly defragmented and checked by Dr Norton.
>
>Can anybody give me some ideas to try to improve this?
>
>Many thanks
>
>mdv
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |