jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 73806 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "ben_w_johnson" <ben_w_johnson@...>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 9:28:48 AM
Subject: [LAM] Logic with Digi002R
Message #149249
Can I use Logic 6 Gold with a Digi 002 Rack, or must it be Logic 6 Platinum? I've asked this question on the DUC, but gotten no response. I know that there are lots of folks interested in using Logic 6 with 002R hardware, but there is a huge lack of information on exactly how to do it. Can anyine share their experience in using the two?
Viewed 546 times, 2 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Ricardo" <ricardo@...>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 10:51:35 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic with Digi002R
Message #149253
This is a reply to #149249.
<Quotes repositioned and trimmed by admin> ben_w_johnson wrote: > Can I use Logic 6 Gold with a Digi 002 Rack, or must it be Logic 6 > Platinum? I've asked this question on the DUC, but gotten no > response. I know that there are lots of folks interested in using > Logic 6 with 002R hardware, but there is a huge lack of > information on exactly how to do it. > > Can anyine share their experience in using the two? > Of course if you are in Os X.2.6. Digidesign have CoreAudio for Digi002 R, you need Protools 6.1.1 or higer installed. http://www.digidesign.com/download/coreaudio/ Regards.
Viewed 932 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@...>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic with Digi002R
Message #149270
This is a reply to #149249.
"ben_w_johnson" <ben_w_johnson@...> writes: > Can I use Logic 6 Gold with a Digi 002 Rack Yes. You need to install ProTools 6.11 in order to get the required CoreAudio elements so that it works with 3rd party software such as Logic in OSX. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!"
Viewed 821 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: James Ryan <jeryan@...>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 at 12:59:54 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] disk fragmentation
Message #149279
This is a reply to #149253.
Hi gang, We had a string a while ago about disk fragmentation, and one voice stated that with OSX or "modern operating systems" it was no longer necessary or desirable to defrag your drives. I couldn't see the logic in that statement, so I contacted Alsoft, the makers of Disk Warrior and Plus Optimizer, asked him if defragging was desirable in OSX, and here is his reply: "Unix will install files sporadically throughout the disk. This helps reduce file fragmentation but not disk fragmentation. OS X performs the same kind of installation procedure as mentioned above. While this may help file fragmentation it does not help disk fragmentation and the fragmentation of free space. The more spread out the files become the more disk activity you will have and the less contiguous free space you will have. This sporadic placement of files could pose a problem for people working with video and/or audio files as well as users needing large amounts of contiguous free space. Running a disk optimizer will lessen disk activity, speed up file access, and free up contiguous free space. PlusOptimizer v2.0, our native X version, is currently in development. We have not set a release date for PlusOptimizer v2.0 but if you like you could add your name to our mailing list so you can be notified when the new version has been released. The mailing list is at <http:// www.alsoft.com/listmanagement.html>. If you have any additional questions please feel free to contact us. -- Mike Rogers Alsoft Tech Support www.Alsoft.com
Viewed 1642 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.