For those Pulsar users on the list (or anyone else intending to use EASI with LA4), you may be interested in Ingo's latest news on Pulsar 1.3 and EASI drivers for Logic (see below). Apparently Emagic are still having problems with their own implementation of EASI. Anyone with any information on this subject? Jules > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ir@...> > To: <pulsar-scope@egroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 11:25 AM > Subject: [pulsar-scope] Re: Fw: [LUG] Sonorus Studi/o EASI driversreleased! > > > You will not be able to use the Sonorus EASI driver, because Logic does not fully support EASI yet. Our EASI driver is basically finished (already for some time now), but we could not test all features yet (the latest Logic beta still has some problems with EASI). We will probably release 1.3 soon, if possible with EASI drivers, otherwise we have to wait for Emagic and the latest test results and release the EASI driver some days later. We don't think it makes much sense to be the first company to release a (possibly not fully tested) EASI driver just for the sake of being the first. If Sonorus thinks it makes sense, this is their decision. Ingo, CreamWare ----- Original Message ----- From: Jules Bromley <julien@...> To: <pulsar-scope@egroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [pulsar-scope] Re: Fw: [LUG] Sonorus Studi/o EASI driversreleased! > Thanks Ingo. Point taken. > > I would have thought Emagic would have provided you with a beta of LA4.1 > (which I understand is due to be released December 6 - i.e.. next week). > I'm worried if there are still outstanding problems with EASI, especially as > it's their own proprietary interface. > > You don't need me to tell you that plenty of us are desperate for EASI to be > fully implemented and to operate successfully. I totally agree that there > is no point in releasing a driver if there's a risk it doesn't work, > although some of us are probably desperate enough to try it out anyway. > > I'll post a message on the Logic group and email Emagic directly regarding > this issue. > > Thanks again for your response. > > Jules Bromley