100% Exact! As probably some people on the list, I'm a musician/teacher/recordist/arranger coming from Notator/Unitor...1040STE! :) I cannot imagine my life without LAWP, even if I use it only since february! André Bart Rademakers a écrit: > > From: "Bart Rademakers" <bartr@...> > > Hi fellow-LUGgers > > Almost 97 % (or so) of all the mail passing by on this list consist of audio > and technical stuff. No problem with that. > My entrance in Logic actually was from the notation facilities in Notator, > as was the case with many 'talking' and even more 'silent' LUG-members, I'm > pretty sure. > > To my opinion, notation in Logic is excellent. I spend about 50 to 80 hours > a week with scores and parts in Logic, which almost proves I love it.... I > think no other program beats it in this combo of scoring and sequencing. > Graphically it may be left a bit behind by Finale, but in this dynamic > interaction of scoring, sequencing and audio Logic rules! > Though I still have several serious wishes to come true, I can say that > almost anything is possible in Logic's scores - and it's looks are as > esthetical, professional and persuasive as one could wish, for any musician > or publisher, from one-bar examples to symphonic scores. > > Bart