jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 73121 of 105756 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Michael Levine <mlmusic@...>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 at 1:06:06 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG][GEN] Bugs Not Fixed
Message #147263
John Pitcairn wrote: > > I'd certainly prefer some more programming effort went into fixing > bugs rather than flashy and expensive new ways to hog CPU power... Hear, hear! I would rather Logic stop "improving" things for 6 months and fix what we've got, including bugs that have been around for years. Of course, they're not the worst--Microsoft has decided to make a reassessment of their "Total Reliability" when, one year into the program, the PC world was hit with four major viruses/worms in two weeks. Glad I'm Mac for everything but Gigas. cheers, Michael Levine
Viewed 247 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: doubleA <doubleA@...>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 at 4:58:13 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG][GEN] Bugs Not Fixed
Message #147301
This is a reply to #147263.
>> I'd certainly prefer some more programming effort went into fixing >> bugs rather than flashy and expensive new ways to hog CPU power... > > Hear, hear! I would rather Logic stop "improving" things for 6 months and > fix what we've got, including bugs that have been around for years. I'd like to cheer in with that too. But I heard they added new features with 6.5 (now beta) so I guess we'll see a new load of bugs coming with that... :-( Michel
Viewed 242 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.