|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
<subject header fixed by admin - pls use an appropriate
tag as outlined in the msg footer below>
Hi everyone!
I am a first time logic user and have been spending the last few days
getting used to
the new environment. I just wanted to see if anyone else has had the issues
I've
encountered.
Here is my setup:
Powerbook G4 667
1 GB RAM
Logic Audio Platinum 6.2.1
MOTU 896 with Firewire Driver 1.05
Emagic Unitor8 mkII
I setup my K2500XS and JV-1080 to be connected to the Unitor. MIDI seems to
work
fine. The K2500XS is going into the AES/EBU ins on the 896, and the JV is
going into
analog 3.4. So far, so good.
I create 4 audio input objects in Logic to monitor inputs 3,4,9,and 10,
respectively.
Audio comes through fine, but I notice a rather large latency problem that
makes it
very difficult to play. I press a key, and there is a delay before I
actually hear
anything.
So then I notice that in the audio preferences panel, I had set the I/O
buffer to be
2048, and I read on the web that reducing this value will reduce latency (as
well as
the number of audio tracks you can use simultaneously). So, I set it all the
way down
to 64, and now there is no detectable latency. Great! Or so I thought...now
there are
fairly frequent audio pops and clicks and general audio noise.
I read stuff on the newsgroups talking about how to get rid of audio pops,
turning
velocity engine off, disabling Altivec, etc. and so I go ahead and set the
processor
type to "generic", as opposed to PowerPC Altivec. Still no luck. I
finally decided to try
messing with the I/O buffer value a little more, and it seems that when it's
set at 128,
the pops and clicks go away, and there is only a very slight latency when
monitoring.
If in fact the pops and clicks stay gone, I can live with the slight
latency.
BUT, I guess the big question out of all this is: has anyone else seen this
apparent
trade-off between latency and audio noise in the I/O buffer parameter? Or
perhaps
I've missed the boat on this. Is there any way to minimize latency and still
use
software monitoring cleanly? What is it that causes these audio pops anyway?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot!
-Greg
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "chune11"
<gregory_chun@s...> wrote:
> messing with the I/O buffer value a little more, and it seems that
> when it's set at 128,
> the pops and clicks go away, and there is only a very slight latency
> when monitoring.
This is also my experience when running multiple live inputs (usually
all 18, would use more if I had them) alongside softsynths and midi -
64 samples is usually unusable, 128 is usually rock solid, whether OS9
or OSX.
If I lose the softsynths or the multiple live inputs then 64 is
generally usable, though my experience with VSTis in OS 9 was that
some softsynths just don't much like a 64 sample buffer anyway.
You can reduce your latency using a 128 sample buffer by running at a
higher sample rate, though the processor/disk requirements of running
at 88.2 or 96kHz will likely far outweigh the fairly slim benefits of
the halved latency.
RME Hammerfall DSP Multiface, Powerbook G4 1GHz, OS X 10.2.5
John Pitcairn
On 9/5/03 2:38 PM, "chune11" <gregory_chun@...> wrote:
> BUT, I guess the big question out of all this is: has anyone else seen
this
> apparent trade-off between latency and audio noise in the I/O buffer
> parameter? Or perhaps I've missed the boat on this. Is there any way to
> minimize latency and still use software monitoring cleanly? What is it
that
> causes these audio pops anyway?
>
> Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot!
>
> -Greg
welcome to the Buffer Game :) this is common to all current DAWs as far as I
know and actually has more to do with your audio interface and how its
drivers interact with both CoreAudio and your DAW. to my knowledge a truly
"latency-free" interface does not exist though some manufacturers
have come
up with clever marketing phrases that would indicate otherwise. For example
your MOTU 896 does feature near-zero latency monitoring for any 2 inputs. in
order to achieve this the 896 driver flows the audio coming in to the 2
selected inputs and pumps them directly out of the interface vs. going
through the computer for processing. If you have the latest 896 driver you
should have the MOTU Console application that allows you to select which 2
inputs you want to monitor "latency-free".
For a lot of applications this is an acceptable compromise. However this
doesn't solve the latency issue if you're trying to record on more than 2
inputs simultaneously, e.g., if you were recording a band or if you were
mic'ing drums, OR a situation where you want to hear what you're recording
through any effects/processing done within Logic.
In these situations you would resort to the buffer game, which at its
simplest level works something like this:
* when recording, set your buffers as low as possible and disable any
non-essential tracks. I personally find a setting of 256 acceptable for most
MIDI stuff. Drums/percussion I'll go down to 128.
* when NOT recording bump your buffers up to 512 or 1024. when mixing you
may want to go higher as a higher buffer setting tends to = more plugin
count.
hope that helps!
regards,
brian
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |