jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 6922 of 105808 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: james <df-jfjr@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 at 9:15:15 AM
Subject: Re: low latency possible in "native" (or mostly native) setups
Message #8966
> A lot of soundcards these days have what is called as "hardware > through," where the signal goes in the card and back out without going > through the CPU for processing (Sonorus, DSP Factory, plus others). The DSP Factory has dsp chips on it.It doesn't use the cpu.As a result it can do a lot of the same thing Pro Tools can- Mixing live inputs,headpnone mixes with reverb,no latency mixing. > I just don't get these "Why is Pro Tools so expensive?" and > "Why can't I do this with a $1000 card?" questions The DSP Factory does it for a $1000. (list).The obvious limitation is fixed DSP (as opposed to plugins) and software support.Not all of the functions are supported by Emagic(meters on the dynamics-keying inputs etc..)I've used PT and think its great.Is it better than the dsp factory? YEs. 10x better.Not IMHOI do think Digi is charging too much for PT.
Viewed 323 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.