f-erenc szabo wrote: > > From: zerobeat@... (f-erenc szabo) > > Here's a curious thing I found on the Cubase List: > > lglaser@... writes: > >Go to a search engine and do a search to find web > >pages that include the words both "Emagic" and "crash". > >Do the same with the words "Steinberg" and "crash". > >I did it in Yahoo and got 160 returns for Emagic+crash > >and 1430 for Steinberg+crash. Good for wars : I think we should stay far away from those types of statistics Example sentences which would create hits (replace where you would read Emagic >steinberg and vice versa: 0/1 I advice you to buy emagic logic : by the way did you see the report of the plane crash 1/2 emagic does not crash 2/3 I made a sound of a crash in Cubase (from steinberg) 3/4 Windows crashed again and took emagic with it 4/5 By the way the way this mail and f-erence mail added one to each score (crash steinberg - crash emagic) 5/6 Do not put either Emagic nor Steinberg stickers on this crash helmet The glue will weaken the structure 7/8 etc. etc. ================ Bad Sales men, en boys who have to convince themselves that they have bought the best products, need those statistics. I hope Steinbergs products are good and stable, just as I hope Emagic products are good and stable. I hope both will develop a different way of how a DAW should look like , so we can choose what is best for our purpose. That is why most likely : My face is different, my house is different, my bike is different, my wife is different, i write different songs , I use emagic in a different way. That is why we have Internet ( if we were the same we did not need it ). True we need some standards to be able to communicate our differences: That is why i speak dutch and learned a bit of English, some count from zero and others from one, his do sounds like a C to me , and her do like a prime. etc. Frank By the way which key was 4:33 by John Cage