if i have a situation ( law5.3) where i have not enought cpu for my pluging( waves!) i do i use digital mixdown or bounce?? i have always used bounce as a final mixdown tool and digital mixdown just to glue unrelated regions. am i missing some advantage to DM in this situation? i would guess use DM to glue a section( IE brass section) together then use the pluging on the mixdown section? any ideas thanks in advanced mike

On a fine day, 27-02-2003, mike_harper98 <mike_harper98@...> wrote: >if i have a situation ( law5.3) where i have not enought cpu for my >pluging( waves!) i do i use digital mixdown or bounce?? i have >always used bounce as a final mixdown tool and digital mixdown just >to glue unrelated regions. am i missing some advantage to DM in >this situation? i would guess use DM to glue a section( IE brass >section) together then use the pluging on the mixdown section? Mixdown doesn't include the effects (but does include volume and panning, if my mind's still functioning), while bounce does render all inserted effects as well. That's the difference, so which one you use depends on what you want to achieve. -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com

> Från: mike_harper98 <mike_harper98@...> > if i have a situation ( law5.3) where i have not enought cpu for my > pluging( waves!) i do i use digital mixdown or bounce?? i have > always used bounce as a final mixdown tool and digital mixdown just > to glue unrelated regions. am i missing some advantage to DM in > this situation? i would guess use DM to glue a section( IE brass > section) together then use the pluging on the mixdown > section? any ideas thanks in advanced mike Well, you kind of answered your own qutstion on this one ;-) Just remember to bounce to a 24 bit if you are dong it, including effects, for a short channel section to save up CPU resources.

> Mixdown doesn't include the effects (but does include volume and > panning, if my mind's still functioning), Not anymore (including volume and pan, that is). I recall they changed this at the time they introduced the Bounce feature. Christian

On a fine day, 28-02-2003, christianobermaier <christianobermaier@...> wrote: > > Mixdown doesn't include the effects (but does include volume and >> panning, if my mind's still functioning), > >Not anymore (including volume and pan, that is). I recall they >changed this at the time they introduced the Bounce feature. Go figure how much I use mixdown... :) Thx 4 da update (2 keep in line with half the population here :) -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com

Sorry for the OT, but recently I've been getting annoying mails every time I send a msg to the LUG. All identical and being sent from the same address, like this: >From: Alexander-admin@... >[...lots of headers...] >Your mail to 'Alexander' with the subject > > Re: [LUG] [GEN] digital mixdown with clipscan or bounce > >Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > >The reason it is being held: > > Message has implicit destination > >Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive >notification of the moderator's decision. Just wondered if somehow I'm alone in this (in which case I'll have to figure this out by myself), or if everyone's getting them (in which case some group member here probably needs his *ss kicked for messing up his sytem or something). -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com

At 5:10 PM +0100 2/28/03, Hendrik Jan Veenstra wrote: >Sorry for the OT, but recently I've been getting annoying mails every >time I send a msg to the LUG. All identical and being sent from the >same address, like this: I haven't gotten them before, but I got two this morning - I'll probably get another one now ;) Len www.Swiftkick.com

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@k...> wrote: > Sorry for the OT, but recently I've been getting annoying mails > every time I send a msg to the LUG. All identical and being sent > from the same address, like this: Very weird.. I've removed that member from the group, hopefully if he's still around he'll sign back up from a valid email address. Thanks for the heads up everyone. Btw messages about problems with Yahoo Groups etc can be [GEN] not [OT]. Cheers Jeremy LUG Admin

On a fine day, 28-02-2003, Jeremy Martin <jeremy@...> wrote: >--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@k...> >wrote: >> Sorry for the OT, but recently I've been getting annoying mails >> every time I send a msg to the LUG. All identical and being sent >> from the same address, like this: > > >Very weird.. I've removed that member from the group, hopefully if >he's still around he'll sign back up from a valid email address. >Thanks for the heads up everyone. > >Btw messages about problems with Yahoo Groups etc can be [GEN] not >[OT]. Yeah, but I wasn't sure if it was yahoo or something on my side, having to do with this guy, or whatever. Anyway, thanks everyone for confirming, both privately and here... -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com

Hi Gentleman! How do I get Apple Musical Instruments (QT?) in OSX to be multitimbral and to have more than piano sound?!? Also! I have Edirol HQ Orchestral plug in for my notebook! The same story! Also internal sounds worl with Band in the Box, but noe with Logic!! Thanks for help and advice!! Mike U