jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 67052 of 105802 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "calroy222 <calroy@...>" <calroy@...>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 at 1:13:58 AM
Subject: [LAM] Where is the MP option button in 5.5 on OSX, please? Help!
Message #131625
The Multi-Processor option that should be at the bottom of the Audio Drivers prefs page is gone. Where did it go? Is it right in front of my face??? Help.
Viewed 720 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Haven Siguenza <evil_o@...>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 at 2:52:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Where is the MP option button in 5.5 on OSX,
Message #131630
This is a reply to #131625.
> The Multi-Processor option that should be at the bottom > of the Audio Drivers prefs page is gone. > Where did it go? Is it right in front of my face??? Help. It is not there because OS X deals with the multiple processors for all of the applications. Logic under OS X with multiple processors always uses both, since the OS always uses both. Hence the option is gone, since it is no longer a user option. -Haven
Viewed 483 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "jefffuhrer <fuhrerj@...>" <fuhrerj@...>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 5:05:24 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Where is the MP option button in 5.5 on OSX, please? Help!
Message #133221
This is a reply to #131630.
> > The Multi-Processor option that should be at the bottom > > of the Audio Drivers prefs page is gone. > > Where did it go? Is it right in front of my face??? Help. Haven Siguenza <evil_o@c...> wrote: > It is not there because OS X deals with the multiple processors > for all of the applications. Logic under OS X with multiple > processors always uses both, since the OS always uses both. Hence > the option is gone, since it is no longer a user option. Does this mean it's no longer possible to force tracks to one processor or the other? In OS 9, by using the I/O insert, one could force a track to be processed by the processor normally devoted to effects/insert processing. This was accomplished by inserting the I/O insert, setting a valid output track, and then bypassing the I/O insert. Is there still a way to do this in OS X? How would we know if it worked? There's no meter to see CPU1 and CPU2 independently. Thanks! Jeff
Viewed 388 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.