>>> The multiple outs inside pHATmatik >>> are assigned on a per slice basis. So you'd have to manually assign each >>> slice >>> of each loop on each midi channel to the output you want. Do-able, but worth >>> the trouble?.... Not to me.. >>> -- >>> Eli Krantzberg >> ya but if you use the select all button you can change all the slice's outs >> at once, AFAIK >> >> teddybut Koichi :-) wrote: > > ok.....so, can I use just one instance of PMP and each one of 16 > midi ch has its own mixer ch....so each one of 16 pHAT loops > can be processed by different PlugIn EFX??? no. but 4 stereo or 8 mono can. > or....like Eli said in this case is it much easier to use 16 instance of PMP? maybe that's true, I don't agree, respectfully. I just have an autoload with already routed multi channel VSTi's (EXS, PMP) into pre setup auxes and I'm ready to load my own multi channel presets any time without much thought. > But if it can be done by just one instance, does it save lots of CPU > power or not??? it must save some. Anyone? > I thought this is one of PMP's selling point....... > I'm kind of confused about multi out inside of PMP, too.....is it 4 > stereo pair or something??? but it has nothing to do with the set > up I explained above, I think....cause above set up is about > Multi-Timber function of PMP....not multi out.....am I correct??? > Please help me out to understand PMP's Functions and > Possibilities.....cause I love this VSTi..... PMP has multi channel (audio) AND it is multi timbral (midi) those are 2 separate concepts that are not linked to each other in any way. A non multi channel instance of PMP can still be multi timbral. Ultimately I got PMP cause it can handle 8 chopped loops with independent processing (outs) with one VSTi. happynewyear teddybut