jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 65857 of 105796 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: YAVUZ AKYAZICI <yavuz1@...>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 9:58:55 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Ad-Limiter Master still causes Huge delay 		Message #128421
>There is nothing to be fixed. The delay is a 'look-ahead' delay and is >part of the spec of this mastering tool. Well, you may be right but I always thought this was comparable to L1 Maximizer series of waves(which is also a mastering tool). There is no delay issue with them. Don't they also 'look ahead'? May be they don't. I honestly do not know. However, I always add stuff later. Sometimes, you feel like adding an organ somewhere after you levels are well balanced. Then if you used Ad-Limiter, you would have to turn it off and redo everything. So, I will just use another type of limiter that do not cause any delay. I still think this could have been designed so it would not cause any delay. But that's me...:-) Yavuz AKYAZICI Guitar Player http://yavuzmusic.com
Viewed 656 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Newtown Music" <muhammed@...>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 10:20:21 AM
Subject: AW: [LUG] [GEN] Ad-Limiter Master still causes Huge delay 		Message #128423
This is a reply to #128421.
> >There is nothing to be fixed. The delay is a 'look-ahead' delay and is > >part of the spec of this mastering tool. > Von: YAVUZ AKYAZICI [mailto:yavuz1@...] > Well, you may be right but I always thought this was comparable to L1 > Maximizer series of waves(which is also a mastering tool). There is no > delay issue with them. Don't they also 'look ahead'? > May be they don't. I honestly do not know. > L1 does lookahead, and it has a delay of only 64 samples, like all Waves dynamic plug ins
Viewed 788 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "yavuz_akyazici <yavuz1@...>" <yavuz1@...>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 11:22:15 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Ad-Limiter Master still causes Huge delay 		Message #128430
This is a reply to #128423.
> L1 does lookahead, and it has a delay of only 64 samples, like all Waves > dynamic plug ins I have to try this but I am pretty sure I was not hearing any delay with L1 at the master before. So, how does 64 samples translate to miliseconds? Yavuz AKYAZICI Guitar Player http://yavuzmusic.com
Viewed 2140 times, 2 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Newtown Music" <muhammed@...>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 11:47:33 AM
Subject: [LUG] [GEN] Ad-Limiter Master still causes Huge delay 		Message #128433
This is a reply to #128430.
> I have to try this but I am pretty sure I was not hearing any delay > with L1 at the master before. > > So, how does 64 samples translate to miliseconds? 1.45 ms @44.1k sample rate
Viewed 2112 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "cruzeman2001 <radiance@...>" <radiance@...>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 12:12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Ad-Limiter Master still causes Huge delay 		Message #128434
This is a reply to #128430.
> > L1 does lookahead, and it has a delay of only 64 samples, like all Waves > > dynamic plug ins "yavuz_akyazici <yavuz1@m...>" <yavuz1@m...> wrote: > I have to try this but I am pretty sure I was not hearing any delay > with L1 at the master before. > > So, how does 64 samples translate to miliseconds? That's 1,4 milliseconds I think. Logic allows only quite big delay adjustments but 1,4 ms. is one of them. Take care, Radiance
Viewed 2135 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.