jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 63686 of 105729 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 at 5:30:02 PM
Subject: [LAW] LAWP/WinXP/Fat32
Message #123077
Logic/WinXP and Fat32 have a latency problem wich seemes to be confirmed by Emagic. Is this something that is going to be fixed or are we going to stick with it? I have a lot of Fat32 harddisks with finnished CD's on them. Will they work fine if I just move the songs to a NTFS drive? -- Arvid Solvang http://www.viagram.no/
Viewed 196 times, 2 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Nick Howe" <nicq@...>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 at 1:36:35 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAW] LAWP/WinXP/Fat32
Message #123129
This is a reply to #123077.
From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...> > Logic/WinXP and Fat32 have a latency problem wich seemes to be confirmed by Emagic. > Is this something that is going to be fixed or are we going to stick with it? > > I have a lot of Fat32 harddisks with finnished CD's on them. > Will they work fine if I just move the songs to a NTFS drive? Yes, you can either copy them across to ntfs or convert fat 32 to ntfs. The only disadvantages to converting are compatability issues (95/98/mac?) and an increase in the amount of time needed to defrag It works v.well on ntfs see here... http://www.aumha.org/a/ntfs.php Cheers EW.
Viewed 153 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Obliviän_|_Bacteria_AS?= <oblivian@...>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 at 9:35:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAW] LAWP/WinXP/Fat32
Message #123142
This is a reply to #123077.
From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...> > Logic/WinXP and Fat32 have a latency problem wich seemes to be > confirmed by Emagic. Is this something that is going to be fixed > or are we going to stick with it? > > I have a lot of Fat32 harddisks with finnished CD's on them. > Will they work fine if I just move the songs to a NTFS drive? Why do you use FAT32 with Win XP? It is so quick and easy to just convert your HD's to NTFS... Further more, it is never adviced to mix Fat32 with NTFS regardless of Logic anyhow. Are you running multiple systems?
Viewed 157 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Arvid Solvang" <arvid@...>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 at 4:41:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAW] LAWP/WinXP/Fat32
Message #123152
This is a reply to #123142.
From: "Obliviän | Bacteria AS" <oblivian@...> > Why do you use FAT32 with Win XP? It is so quick and easy to just convert > your HD's to NTFS... Further more, it is never adviced to mix Fat32 with > NTFS regardless of Logic anyhow. Are you running multiple systems? First of all - FAT32 is a fully supported filesystem for WinXP and I use it on all drives. I have lots of harddisks in trays that are Fat32. I also use Paris wich doesn't work on WinXP so I have WinME also on my machine. Absolutely all other software I had on my StudioPC worked fine with Fat32 - only Logic had trouble with it. To me that means that Emagic haven't gotten their WinXP support right yet. What else doesn't work....? I'm back on ME. -- Arvid Solvang http://www.viagram.no/
Viewed 190 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Derek M." <derekmiller1@...>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 3:54:56 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAW] LAWP/WinXP/Fat32
Message #123275
This is a reply to #123152.
> > Why do you use FAT32 with Win XP? It is so quick and easy to just convert > > your HD's to NTFS... Further more, it is never adviced to mix Fat32 with > > NTFS regardless of Logic anyhow. Are you running multiple systems? > First of all - FAT32 is a fully supported filesystem > for WinXP and I use it on all drives. > I have lots of harddisks in trays that are Fat32. > I also use Paris wich doesn't work on WinXP so I > have WinME also on my machine. I have a FAT32 SCSI and a FAT32 IDE they both had pops & clicks due to latency that I thought was attributed to the crappy first issue FIRESTATION drivers. Does the LUG think it's because of FAT32?
Viewed 167 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.