jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 6324 of 105817 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "David Atkin" <phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 at 3:47:07 AM
Subject: Re: Re: OT-Audio Compression
Message #8368
Hi, In my experience, coding of a .wav file to MP3 and subesquent decoding back to .wav results in very little sonic degradation. I have to resort to this method of sending files over the internet from time to time, and while it is not perfect, it is the easiest solution, and offers by far the greatest compression ratio. Zap from Emagic, and Winrar are other alternatives you could try. Regards, David Atkin phoenix@... ----- Original Message ----- From: Hanno di Rosa <dirosa@...> To: <logic-users@onelist.com> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:06 PM Subject: [LUG] Re: OT-Audio Compression > From: Hanno di Rosa <dirosa@...> > > From: "Charlie de la Rosa" > I'm needing to send large audio files (20mb to 40mb) over the internet and > wanted to know what the consensus was on audio compression apps. > > I guess the Mpg3 encoder and decoder can do that , and were invented for that. > There is a vast number of companies offering encoders I guess macamp is one > of them. > I have never checked the quality of re-decoded mpg3 files into SDII , but > if you want to send audio via the net , mpg3 is the best way to go. > ciao
Viewed 367 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.