jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 61375 of 105817 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Michael Haydn <mhaydn@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 11:47:21 AM
Subject: Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117303
Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de -- Beste Gruesse - best regards, Michael Haydn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Michael Haydn mhaydn@... SoundDiver Group Executive http://www.emagic.de/ Logic Developer (Logic Control integration) Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH - Germany Phone: +49 4101 495 0 Halstenbeker Weg 96, 25462 Rellingen Fax : +49 4101 495 199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Viewed 516 times, 8 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Erland <musicmaker@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 11:58:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117306
This is a reply to #117303.
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 12:47 PM, Michael Haydn wrote: > Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de > -- > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, WOOHOOOO! Now if only my EMI 2|6 would work on my Mac. I can't even monitor sounds without distortions. Erland mp3.com/erland
Viewed 520 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Urs Heckmann <urs@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 1:01:01 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117307
This is a reply to #117303.
>Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de >-- > >Beste Gruesse - best regards, >Michael Haydn Cool, also the drivers. Long awaited! And when' Gold comming? ;) Urs
Viewed 515 times, 2 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Michael Haydn <mhaydn@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 12:08:58 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117308
This is a reply to #117307.
At 19:01 Uhr +0100 01.09.2002, Urs Heckmann wrote: >And when' Gold comming? Later. -- Beste Gruesse - best regards, Michael Haydn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Michael Haydn mhaydn@... SoundDiver Group Executive http://www.emagic.de/ Logic Developer (Logic Control integration) Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH - Germany Phone: +49 4101 495 0 Halstenbeker Weg 96, 25462 Rellingen Fax : +49 4101 495 199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Viewed 505 times, 4 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Urs Heckmann <urs@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 1:25:07 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117312
This is a reply to #117308.
>At 19:01 Uhr +0100 01.09.2002, Urs Heckmann wrote: >>And when' Gold comming? > >Later. >-- Good to know after all the terrifying rumors 'bout that unified Titanium thing... ;) Urs
Viewed 505 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: ReadyFireAim <readyfireaim@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 12:42:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117314
This is a reply to #117303.
From: "Michael Haydn" <mhaydn@...> > Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de > -- > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > Michael Haydn holy shit. that is all. ds.
Viewed 476 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Colin Miller <snoopy@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 1:02:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117316
This is a reply to #117308.
At 07:08 PM 9/1/2002 +0200, you wrote: >At 19:01 Uhr +0100 01.09.2002, Urs Heckmann wrote: >>And when' Gold comming? > >Later. >-- > >Beste Gruesse - best regards, >Michael Haydn Thanks for clearing that up, what a mystery it was. Now the rumors won't get started. Colin Miller
Viewed 494 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "enemyofsilence" <enemyofsilence@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 1:39:38 PM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117321
This is a reply to #117303.
--- In logic-users@y..., Michael Haydn <mhaydn@m...> wrote: > Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de > -- > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > Michael Haydn Just downloaded the Motu 828 Beta drivers and LAMP X, and fired it up.... It's ALIVE! Brought up an instance of the ES2 and the latency is practically non-existent! This ROCKS! rig=mirror-door DP 1Ghz w/OSX 10.2, 1.25 Gig Ram, Unitor 8MkII/AMT-8 cascade, Motu 828. So far so good! Gonna have to continue with os9 for the time being - UAD-1 support et. al. But this is reeeallly promising! Thanks Michael! Sean G.
Viewed 512 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: res0934j <res0934j@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 1:45:17 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117322
This is a reply to #117308.
Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards to track count and plug-in processing, in other words will upgrading to OSX mean more or less performance power...?
Viewed 496 times, 2 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "dj_shatterglass" <dj_shatterglass@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 3:21:01 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117332
This is a reply to #117308.
--- In logic-users@y..., Michael Haydn <mhaydn@m...> wrote: > At 19:01 Uhr +0100 01.09.2002, Urs Heckmann wrote: > >And when' Gold comming? > > Later. > -- Coincidentally, that's when Emagic's getting another cent out of me. Maybe.
Viewed 474 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "St - Musaic.Net" <st@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 3:59:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117337
This is a reply to #117322.
> Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards to track > count and plug-in processing, in other words will upgrading to > OSX mean more or less performance power...? Stop sending messages like that with X-Priority set to "(High)"! What is it in that message urges us all to prioritize it? / St
Viewed 454 times, 2 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Raymund Beyer <brainstorm@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 5:09:47 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117340
This is a reply to #117337.
> >> Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards to track >> count and plug-in processing, in other words will upgrading to >> OSX mean more or less performance power...? > > Stop sending messages like that with X-Priority set to "(High)"! > What is it in that message urges us all to prioritize it? New Macs might not boot OS 9 in the future. I guess rather sooner than later. It is important things are working fine at this time. Best Ray
Viewed 433 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Raymund Beyer <brainstorm@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 5:12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117342
This is a reply to #117337.
> >> Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards to track >> count and plug-in processing, in other words will upgrading to >> OSX mean more or less performance power...? > > Stop sending messages like that with X-Priority set to "(High)"! > What is it in that message urges us all to prioritize it? New Macs might not boot OS 9 in the future. I guess rather sooner than later. It is important things are working fine at this time. Best Ray
Viewed 429 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "tonyinodense" <tony@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 4:06:34 PM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117343
This is a reply to #117303.
Thanks, Michael, and the rest of the guys! I've played around with it for an hour or so. Had to use my Mac's audio out, coz there aren't drivers for my trusty AW8. And of course I couldn't use my Waves plugins. Basically, the OSX version looks beautiful and works just as I expect it to. Hard to measure performance, though, since I can't use my Waves plugins, which take of most of my processing power. Look forward to hearing about everyone else's experiences. Good job, Emagic, and please finish the AW8 driver ...
Viewed 456 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "lotusmajordomo" <richmondj@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 4:37:28 PM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117345
This is a reply to #117321.
> So far so good! Gonna have to continue with os9 for the time being - > UAD-1 support et. al. > Wow.... I am impressed. Kinda almost second guessing my decision to go Protools now. :-) Wonder when Digi will put their fingers out and go OSX for HD?? Tasty! JR > But this is reeeallly promising! > Thanks Michael! > Sean G.
Viewed 457 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "no_such_user" <no_such_user@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 6:34:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] OSX Logic for Gold Users (Was Logic for Mac OS X released) 		Message #117355
This is a reply to #117307.
(no text)
Viewed 460 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Elvis Presley" <elvis.presley@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 7:23:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117357
This is a reply to #117314.
> From: "Michael Haydn" <mhaydn@...> > > > Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de > > -- > > > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > > Michael Haydn > > > holy shit. > > that is all. > > ds. Well, can we Windows users at least get an update with that fancy pancy icon? ;) The current LAP icon looks awful under XP. hehe EP
Viewed 425 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "johnnyturpin" <johnnyturpin@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 9:54:14 PM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117368
This is a reply to #117303.
--- In logic-users@y..., Michael Haydn <mhaydn@m...> wrote: > Please have a look at http://www.emagic.de > -- > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > Michael Haydn Wow. What a surprise! Maybe the whole Apple buyout thingy gave everyone at emagic some super motivation. Hopefully there is work on a OS X version of SoundDiver (Mr Haydn, care to comment)? Or maybe even make it a part of Logic (I would love to be able to double click on a Multi-instrument icon in the environment, and have it pop-up the editor for the synth it is assigned to). I will probably play around with Logic in OS X, but most of my real work will have still be in OS 9, as I have unfortunately grown dependent on SoundDiver and its wonderful editors. I thought everyone in Europe took the month of August off... Is this just myth?
Viewed 446 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "kenn_michael" <kenn@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 10:39:47 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117372
This is a reply to #117322.
--- In logic-users@y..., res0934j <res0934j@v...> wrote: > Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards > to track count and plug-in processing, in other words > will upgrading to OSX mean more or less performance > power...? You'll get the same performance as in OS9. kenn.michael
Viewed 437 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: res0934j <res0934j@...>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 at 12:33:01 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117379
This is a reply to #117372.
> From: "kenn_michael" <kenn@...> > Reply-To: logic-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 03:39:47 -0000 > To: logic-users@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released > > --- In logic-users@y..., res0934j <res0934j@v...> wrote: >> Will the performance be the same as on OS9 in regards >> to track count and plug-in processing, in other words >> will upgrading to OSX mean more or less performance >> power...? > > You'll get the same performance as in OS9. > > kenn.michael Thanks. <extra quotes trimmed by admin> <quotes repositioned by admin>
Viewed 446 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Paul Crowley" <paul@...>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 at 4:57:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117397
This is a reply to #117303.
Fantastic News! Can anybody who's already installed it answer a couple of queries? Currently, there's no "real" info on the emagic site and it'll be a while before I can get to my machine to install the update. Is there a driver for the AW8 card? I can see no mention of it. It would appear that you only need OS10.1. I asssumed that we'd need to install Jaguar before Logic for X would run. As this would not appear to be the case, is there any significant advantage to running 10.2 (performance etc)? Can't wait to try it out. Thank you Emagic.
Viewed 445 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "ewald_kegel" <ekegel@...>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 at 8:55:25 AM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117420
This is a reply to #117397.
> Is there a driver for the AW8 card? I can see no mention of it. I asked Emagic a few weeks ago and said they were working on it. Ewald
Viewed 441 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: res0934j <res0934j@...>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 at 10:55:35 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117436
This is a reply to #117368.
> > I thought everyone in Europe took the month of August off... Is this > just > myth? > Actually the real myth is that Euro's work to live and Americans live to work, but so far OSX is either supported by Motu or Digidesign... ;-)
Viewed 429 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Urs Heckmann <urs@...>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 at 11:13:49 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] Logic for Mac OS X released 		Message #117439
This is a reply to #117436.
Am Montag den, 2. September 2002, um 17:55, schrieb res0934j: >> I thought everyone in Europe took the month of August off... Is this >> just >> myth? >> > > Actually the real myth is that Euro's work to live and Americans live > to work, but so far OSX is either supported by Motu or Digidesign... ;-) > Hm, I'd rather say Logic for OS X is out because they were on vacation?!? ;) Urs (a European guy who spends his vacation doing things)
Viewed 419 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: nitrada <me@...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 at 9:51:43 AM
Subject: [LUG] [LAM] reaktor vst 		Message #122144
This is a reply to #117303.
hi, is there any mac-user on this list using reaktor3 as a VST-remote instrument in lap 5.3 (os9)? best, christophe -- me at nitrada dot com http://nitrada.com wake up and make some noise!
Viewed 454 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Ned Bouhalassa <ned@...>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 at 10:43:17 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] reaktor vst 		Message #122147
This is a reply to #122144.
nitrada wrote: > is there any mac-user on this list using reaktor3 as a VST-remote > instrument in lap 5.3 (os9)? Hahahahahahahahahaha ROFL!!!! Sorry, couldn't help myself. ;-) I've had lots of problems using Reaktor as a VST in Logic (can you say crash?). N.I. say that things are supposed to get much better for us Mac-users in 2003. We'll see... -- http://www.nedfx.com Ned Bouhalassa n e d @ n e d f x . c o m
Viewed 443 times, 1 reply, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Jorma Pennanen <jorma.pennanen@...>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 at 9:20:09 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM] reaktor vst 		Message #122216
This is a reply to #122147.
>> is there any mac-user on this list using reaktor3 as a VST-remote >> instrument in lap 5.3 (os9)? >nitrada wrote: >Hahahahahahahahahaha ROFL!!!! > >Sorry, couldn't help myself. ;-) >I've had lots of problems using Reaktor as a VST in Logic (can you say >crash?). N.I. say that things are supposed to get much better for us >Mac-users in 2003. We'll see... I bought my new Mac a year ago and was seriously considering upgarding my Dynamo to Reaktor 3 but I then read about not being able to use more than one Reaktor instrument at time so I gave up the idea. The fix was supposed to come before Xmas...that is to say Xmas 2002 :-( I'm kinda glad that I didn't buy it because the forthcoming (a heavy cough :-) Reaktor Sessions seems to satisfy my needs. I won't be buying that though unless the box says that it has a free upgrade to OS X AU version...if not., I will wait for that. I'm not going to spend another dime to any OS 9 software only. Cheers -- Check out the web page for my band updated 20.10.2002 with new songs New home address : http://koti.welho.com/jpennane
Viewed 442 times, 0 replies, 27 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.