Mike Connelly wrote: > > From: Mike Connelly <mpc@...> > >Emagic anounced Altivec support for LAM before it was even released. We are > >still waiting for MMX support let alone PIII support. > > One factor may be that altivec may be easier to implement - PIII > optimization requires rewriting by the programmers, where altivec > optimization can be achived (at least to some extent) by just recompiling > with a compiler that supports altivec optimizations. > > Mike maybe they have problems because windows itself is 386 code only