I'm glad to see this thread build a little momentum (though I'm sure the Mac-heads aren't.. ;-) ). I hope Emagic is listening and allocating some serious resources to LAW (not the first time I've said that on this list.) Related to Emagic's shaky Windows implementation (relative to Mac): someone on this list (F-erenc, I think) once wrote that Logic is not written in an object oriented langauge like C, C++, etc. If so that might explain a lot of the difficulty Emagic has coping with the wacky world of Wintel (and why inert bits of code like the instrument icons are supposedly too far enmeshed with the more 'dynamic' bits of code to change them easily). Does anyone know if that's true, and if so, what language is Logic coded in? (Just curious.) ~T ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- > >Now LAM has some of these features like the newest altivec support, VST > >support, OS9 support??( I am not sure about that). However LAW sdoes not. > > >I mean THESE ARE NOT REALLY MINOR DETAILS. Don't you think? Anyone? > > >(I know Emagic will not respond to this so please anyone with similar wish, respond) > > >Thank You > > >Yavuz >