|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
>Randall Thomas wrote:
>
>> So, for some time, I have been doing my final mixes to DAT,
transferring
>> the DAT back to the computer with Wavelab or SoundForge, then
burning to
>> CD. The result is audibly superior than if I had kept everything in
the
>> computer.
>To which "Markus Kaarlonen" intelligently replied:
>I didn't exactly get your point, but anyway to make it clear: Jitter has
>_nothing_ to do with audio quality as long as you keep everything in the
>digital domain. Theoretically it can affect the sound coming from a
>D/A-converter, but the point is it does not change the actual data, the
bits
>are still the same. So if you mean that the DAT machine somehow
magically
>fixes your jittered audio and makes it sound better (if I understood you
>right?), that isn't so. Jitter exists only in digital realtime transfers
and
>is corrected as soon as the audio is recorded on digital tape, hard
disc,
>computer memory etc, where jitter cannot exist.
Markus,
The engineer side of my brain, (not sure which side that is) totally agrees
with you. The musician/producer side of my brain is trying to convince the
engineer that there is a difference. Now, I can see where playing back a
stereo mix from my DAT would sound different than playing back the mix from
hard disk even though I'm using the same D-A converters for monitoring,
which BTW are the converters in the DAT; Sony PCM 7010 which is always
clocked, as is everything else, from the master clock in my Kurzweil DMTI.
Bob Katz' article supports this too. But I can't rationalize why
transferring back to the hard drive would have any effect on the outcome of
the CD. I proof monitor the CD via the same converters, however since I
can't externally clock the CD player, I have to slave the D-As in the DAT
to the incoming IEC958 from the CD player. Now I thought this might be the
answer, but after blind A-B'ing on other peoples systems, the most common
comment I recieve is that the transferred version sounds
"tighter". So go
figure. In any case, it remains a mystery.
Randall
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |