On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Dan & Estera Alvarez wrote: > Mike Connelly wrote: > > > From: Mike Connelly <mpc@...> > > > > LAPM with sonorus studi/o - anybody using it? How well does it work? Is > > the latency as low as they say? What a/d d/a's are you using. Thanks. > > > > Mike > > > > I am using it. It works fine but all the lower latency settings (<1) wreak > havoc (clicks and horrible distortion and what seems like other tracks > feeding back thru the record enable track) so I can't use those settings. > The lowest latency setting of .125 would be quite acceptable to me for > recording and monitoring thru the card, but I simply can't use it for more > than a few seconds. In fact, the only two settings that work are 1 and 1.5. > And I have a 9600 accellerated with Newertech G3/466. What do the .125, 1 and 1.5 settings mean? Milliseconds? Some other units? Have you gotten any answers from emagic or sonorus tech support on why the lower settings won't work (they are supposed to, aren't they?). (Anyone from emagic or sonorus want to respond?) > Personally, I think this is a bug in the SIO driver. But the card works > quite well otherwise, as I said as long as you resign from the idea of > monitoring thru the card while recording (until Emagic fixes this). To me the whole selling point of the sonorus is that you CAN monitor through it - does that not work in general, or is there just something wrong with the implementation in logic? Thanks for the info. Mike