Thomas Whitmore wrote: > From: "Thomas Whitmore" <thomasw@...> > > Hello Christian, > > [About protocol to compensate for plug-in delays:] > >Which is what is actually happening, otherwise you could never hear > >your processed signals in sync with the rest. Imagine what mess > >you'd get when each and every plugin would *not* report it's own > >latency to the program which needs this info to compensate for this > >delay. > > Most plugins do not make significant 'plugin latency' in numbers of samples; > the output buffers are aligned with the input buffers. So these simple > plugins do not need a latency protocol. Exceptions are typically 'lookahead' > limiting/ compression or pitch recognition. Which is exactly the two categories of plugins I'm experiencing this problem with.... -Dan