jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 5403 of 105802 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Dan & Estera Alvarez <danseq@xxxx.xxxx
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 at 1:57:12 AM
Subject: Re: LAPM with sonorus studi/o - anybody using it?
Message #7447
Mike Connelly wrote: > From: Mike Connelly <mpc@...> > > LAPM with sonorus studi/o - anybody using it? How well does it work? Is > the latency as low as they say? What a/d d/a's are you using. Thanks. > > Mike > I am using it. It works fine but all the lower latency settings (<1) wreak havoc (clicks and horrible distortion and what seems like other tracks feeding back thru the record enable track) so I can't use those settings. The lowest latency setting of .125 would be quite acceptable to me for recording and monitoring thru the card, but I simply can't use it for more than a few seconds. In fact, the only two settings that work are 1 and 1.5. And I have a 9600 accellerated with Newertech G3/466. Personally, I think this is a bug in the SIO driver. But the card works quite well otherwise, as I said as long as you resign from the idea of monitoring thru the card while recording (until Emagic fixes this). Regards, Dan
Viewed 287 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.