|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Mike Connelly wrote:
> From: Mike Connelly <mpc@...>
>
> LAPM with sonorus studi/o - anybody using it? How well does it work? Is
> the latency as low as they say? What a/d d/a's are you using. Thanks.
>
> Mike
>
I am using it. It works fine but all the lower latency settings (<1)
wreak
havoc (clicks and horrible distortion and what seems like other tracks
feeding back thru the record enable track) so I can't use those settings.
The lowest latency setting of .125 would be quite acceptable to me for
recording and monitoring thru the card, but I simply can't use it for more
than a few seconds. In fact, the only two settings that work are 1 and 1.5.
And I have a 9600 accellerated with Newertech G3/466.
Personally, I think this is a bug in the SIO driver. But the card works
quite well otherwise, as I said as long as you resign from the idea of
monitoring thru the card while recording (until Emagic fixes this).
Regards,
Dan
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |