|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Hi,
This will be my last contribution on this subject, I give up. Have tried
almost everything to have this thing work at 2 ms with my legal copies of
Logic 4.81 and virtual instruments, like it is supposed to do. Apart from
Macs that currently refuse to get under 6 ms, I tested the EMI on 3 totally
different PCs with the latest driver, at all possible settings (frequency,
reserved bandwith, latency, etc) :
- PIV 1,7, 512 MB, MSI 845 pro (Intel chipset), ATI AIW Radeon, SB Audigy
for MIDI input
- PIII 800, 512 MB, ASUS CUSL2C (Intel chipset), Matrox Marvel G400, MOTU
Fastlane for MIDI input
- PIII 600, 512 MB, MSI 6199-VA (Via chipset with 4in1 latest drivers) ,
Midiman Midisport 1x1 for MIDI input, then MaxiSound Fortissimo (to see if
there wasn't a conflict on the USB channel)
The 3 machines behave globally the same way : plenty of clicks and
incredible CPU consumption at low latencies. Only the PIV allows 2 ms with
no (or few) clicks, but ALL systems regularly reach Logic's maximum CPU
consumption level, with just a single virtual inst. played in realtime, no
matter what kind of instrument it is : sample player or synthesizer. To
avoid this, i have to set the EMI latency to 6 ms at least (ASIO or EASI),
which is 3 times more than an SB Audigy ! If you already have enjoyed the
Audigy's consistant 2 ms latency, you probably won't feel like going
backwards at all...
Conclusion : on a PC, except if used in standalone virtual synths, the EMI
currently performs like an old Audiowerk in terms of *really* useable
latency, and much, much worse in terms of CPU consumption. If someone proves
me wrong, I'll eat my hat.
Yann le Bihan
Hi,
"2 ms are a legend"
Maybe that is true, whatever it is the soundcard you are talking about. I
fancy that EMI 2|6, maybe the latency acheived is not as low as that one a
drummer would need it to be to monitor himself while recording, but it is
low enough for me to play virtual instruments without a mess.
Regards,
Ismael
On Monday, March 4, 2002, at 03:00 AM, Yann Le Bihan wrote:
>
> Conclusion : on a PC, except if used in standalone virtual synths, the
> EMI
> currently performs like an old Audiowerk in terms of *really* useable
> latency, and much, much worse in terms of CPU consumption. If someone
> proves
> me wrong, I'll eat my hat.
>
> Yann le Bihan
if it's of any help i've achieved good resulst @2ms with an 2001 ibook,
with a 256MB piano programme using the virtual memory extension with the
exs24, i even use some plug-in's, that my live rig, i trigger with a
roland dinosaurius A80 keyboard controller.
vico
sonido mambo
mexico
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |