Terry wrote: >At 1.5ms/64: the K2000 was from about 20 (0.4ms) to 76 >(1.7ms) samples (44.1k) ahead of the VSTi. >At 3ms/128: the K2000 was about 58 (1.3ms) to 120 (2.7ms) >samples ahead of the VSTi. >At 6ms/256: the K2000 was around 225 (5.1ms) to 250 (5.6ms) >samples ahead. I wrote that I was getting between 700 and 1000 samples latency. I was also experiencing some other problems that were driving me up the walls. So I did the old mac vodoo I trashed the digiinit prefs zapped the PRAM and rebuilt my desktop. Lo and behold now I am am getting a quite acceptable 200 samples of latency between the M1 drum and the VSTis running under DirectTDM via the e-magic system bridge. That is the first time that particular remedy has had such a dramatic effect for me. I also haven't had a PCI too slow message for a whole two hours. Hurray!!!!

Glad you fixed it - I was wondering what was causing the long delay in your system even at a low buffer setting. How often do you have to delete prefs and rebuild the desktop for your hardware synths? Same here - never. Gotta love computers. Regards, Dedric --- In logic-users@y..., Dennis Gunn <dennisg@a...> wrote: > I wrote that I was getting between 700 and 1000 samples latency. I > was also experiencing some other problems that were driving me up the > walls. So I did the old mac vodoo I trashed the digiinit prefs > zapped the PRAM and rebuilt my desktop. > > Lo and behold now I am am getting a quite acceptable 200 samples of > latency between the M1 drum and the VSTis running under DirectTDM via > the e-magic system bridge.