|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
> on 28/2/02 9:07 PM, Sascha Franck at saschafranck@... wrote:
>
>
> > Just switch your objects to "MIDI" instead of any of the
new modes and
> > you'll be back in the good old days.
uhmm ... thanks sascha.
I'm keeping the update :)
>
>
> So - what's the main reason for upgrading other than the
"improved"
> automation?
>
If you get some kind of flying-fader controller, you need this kind of
automation, IMO.
Great for all Logic Controllers, 02rs and such.
> From: "Peter Duemmler" <merlin@...>
> Being able to mute individual automation parameters is definitely THE
most
> important feature that HAS to be implemented ASAP to make the new
scheme
> usable (and then great!).
> Until now the automation mostly LOOKS good.
>
'Automation View' shouldn't be global (for all tracks at once). ProTools
does this very nicely ...
Drawing empty sequences and using them as auto-sequences, one for every
paramtere, might help.
cheers, bernd
Yes, but it gets quite messy with this workaround.
I´m hoping muting individual automation parameters gets implemented
soon...
Peter
---
http://www.merlinsound.de
----- Original Message -----
From: "R/T" <cowudders@...>
To: <logic-users@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:03 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: GEN: new automation sucks
> > Being able to mute individual automation parameters is definitely
THE
most
> > important feature that HAS to be implemented ASAP to make the new
scheme
> > usable (and then great!).
> > Until now the automation mostly LOOKS good.
> >
>
>
> 'Automation View' shouldn't be global (for all tracks at once).
ProTools
> does this very nicely ...
>
> Drawing empty sequences and using them as auto-sequences, one for every
> paramtere, might help.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |