jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 53408 of 105802 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Martin, Jeremy" <MartJe@...>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 at 5:09:14 PM
Subject: RE: [LUG] GEN Who needs hardware mixers anyway? Not Hammerfall DS
Message #97976
> > I'm using a MOTU set-up and with it's Cuemix feature you can get > zero > > latency monitoring as well. > > Zero latency using MOTU hardware. That's what I have (2408), but > I've never heard of this. If I'm missing something please enlighten > me. I know it's very low latency, but zero? Zero latency directly > into the 2408 would be great! There is a recent Sound on Sound article that describes how to do this, in their most recent (March 2002) edition: http://www.sospubs.co.uk/sos/mar02/articles/logicnotes0302.asp (you have to have the US$36/year E-sub to read articles from the last 6 months)... It has also been described on this list before. First you have to connect some Out port to an In port on the 2408 then send/return the wet signal to another audio channel, to achieve the 0 latency effects monitoring.. > All of my > mixing, however, is done within Logic. I don't see any point in > using a small (16 channel) mixer for mixing. I usually have 40+ > tracks. Logic Control can 'page' between all the tracks of course.. but I definitely see your point! Jeremy
Viewed 915 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Michael Haydn <mhaydn@...>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 at 6:24:42 PM
Subject: RE: [LUG] GEN Who needs hardware mixers anyway? Not Hammerfall DS
Message #97989
This is a reply to #97976.
At 17:09 -0600 28.02.02, Martin, Jeremy wrote: > > All of my > > mixing, however, is done within Logic. I don't see any point in > > using a small (16 channel) mixer for mixing. I usually have 40+ > > tracks. > >Logic Control can 'page' between all the tracks of course.. but I definitely >see your point! Then buy 4 additional Logic Control XTs, and you can control 40 tracks simultaneously, without paging. -- Beste Gruesse - best regards, Michael Haydn EMAGIC Soft- und Hardware GmbH SoundDiver Group Executive Logic Audio Developer Unitor8 Control Project Manager
Viewed 814 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "highlandsource" <ythan@...>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 at 6:55:16 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] GEN Who needs hardware mixers anyway? Not Hammerfall DS P's right?
Message #97997
This is a reply to #97989.
stick with the neve :-) --- In logic-users@y..., Michael Haydn <mhaydn@m...> wrote: > At 17:09 -0600 28.02.02, Martin, Jeremy wrote: > > > All of my > > > mixing, however, is done within Logic. I don't see any point in > > > using a small (16 channel) mixer for mixing. I usually have 40+ > > > tracks. > > > >Logic Control can 'page' between all the tracks of course.. but I definitely > >see your point! > > Then buy 4 additional Logic Control XTs, and you can control 40 > tracks simultaneously, without paging. > -- > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > > Michael Haydn > EMAGIC Soft- und Hardware GmbH > SoundDiver Group Executive > Logic Audio Developer > Unitor8 Control Project Manager
Viewed 729 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.