hi out there! This is not a logic specific question so please forgive me. I am using law and i am a percussion player i have a performence very soon i am doing live music to silence movies. I was always using midigloves conectet to a roland octapad now they are broken and i need to replace them . But I cant find them anymore anywhere. Anyone any ideas. Thanks in advance Thomas Eder -----Message d'origine----- De : logic-users@onelist.com <logic-users@onelist.com> À : logic-users@onelist.com <logic-users@onelist.com> Date : dimanche 12 septembre 1999 05:19 Objet : [LUG] Digest Number 51 > >--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- > >Show your ONElist SPIRIT! ><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/tshirt2 ">Click Here</a> >With a new ONElist SHIRT available through our website. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >There are 25 messages in this issue. > >Topics in today's digest: > > 1. Re: Key commands > From: Yves Gigon <ygigon@v...> > 2. This whole Midi Timing thing!! > From: LWa7778623@a... > 3. Motu 2408 ASIO ? > From: Bob Fowler <bobma@i...> > 4. Dynamic groove templates > From: Brett Stewart <mapenzi@n...> > 5. Hard drive and sloppy timing glitches > From: "Steve Catanzaro" <stevencatanzaro@s...> > 6. RE: VST Plug-ins > From: Christian Obermaier <ChristianObermaier@c...> > 7. LAP MAC L2, ULTRA ATA, ATA, SCSI, ULTRA SCSI and FIREWIRE !!! > From: BLANC CYRIL <blanc.cyril@w...> > 8. Re: OT: 64bit os > From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@f...> > 9. Re: This whole Midi Timing thing!! > From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@f...> > 10. Re: Bits and Logic > From: "Mat Jarvis" <mat@m...> > 11. Re: Digest Number 49 > From: dirosa@l... > 12. Re: RE:LAMG 4.0.2 - Sample rating advice needed > From: "Ron Bommele" <rbommele@w...> > 13. Re: Rubbish MIDI Timing > From: "Yoonchi" <r.g.jonis@s...> > 14. Re: WISH: iterative quantise for audio > From: "Yoonchi" <r.g.jonis@s...> > 15. want to " hardwire " fader box to protools tracks - input pleeze? > From: j_bowers@s... > 16. Calling ISIS card users > From: "b...." <BK@r...> > 17. repeated notes > From: "James" <star5k@h...> > 18. Re: repeated notes > From: "shiftaling" <xenox@w...> > 19. Re: repeated notes > From: "Rick Barse" <wickeys@e...> > 20. VST plugin limit > From: Sound Incarnate <soundincarnate@a...> > 21. Re: burning mono files > From: Bill Trikojus <billyt@a...> > 22. More on Audio Tempo Change. > From: joelindsey@e... > 23. G4 Stealth Serial Port > From: Darrel Merritt <dnanet@p...> > 24. Re: Use of the subject line > From: "Tomer Morad" <morad@i...> > 25. G4 gPort / iMate compatibility > From: Darrel Merritt <dnanet@p...> > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 15:12:34 -0400 > From: Yves Gigon <ygigon@v...> >Subject: Re: Key commands > >In Logic Audio 4.0.2 one find the following key commands in the >sample edit window: > >Left Go to selection start >Right Go to selection end >Down Go to region start >Up Go to region end > > >!!!!! PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING KEY COMMANDS: !!!!!!! > >Shift-Left Go to selection start and deselect >Shift-Right Go to selection end and deselect >Shift-Down Select from cursor to start of region >Shift-Up Select from cursor to end of region > > >I'm trying to emulate here the selection process of SoundEdit 16, >because it's the best and fastest one of every sound editor I came >across. Unfortunately, it's an outdated program. So if you could >implement a similar way to select, would be fantastic. > >Thanks > >Yves Gigon >ygigon@v... >http://pages.infinit.net/ygigon > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 16:18:50 EDT > From: LWa7778623@a... >Subject: This whole Midi Timing thing!! > >Hi, >I'm in the midst of putting together a home studio based around a PC, Paris, >and Logic (the PC is being built, and should be here soon, I hope). But this >Midi timing thing I see everywhere is making me worry. Timing is a bit >crucial when it comes to music, right? Is everyone having trouble? I had been >using an Atari 1040ST (!!!), and never had any trouble. How can you make >music if your timing is off? > >Please tell me it's gonna be alright!! > >Thanks > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 16:28:33 -0400 > From: Bob Fowler <bobma@i...> >Subject: Motu 2408 ASIO ? > >Hi > > I just installed a 2408 system w/ LAM Logic 4.01 >My CPU is 320mhz with 240 megs of ram with a 2940 SCSI card. >After trying to playback 24 tracks of audio the CPU overloaded. >When I try to restart Logic the 324 ASIO driver in will not start due to >low >memory. I alocated as little as 20 megs and as much as 80 megs >to the program but the driver still will not start. I trashed pref's >but nothings working > >Help > >bob > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 14:01:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Brett Stewart <mapenzi@n...> >Subject: Dynamic groove templates > > > >Hello all, > > >One of the features of Notator (back in the days >of Atari) that I used most was the dynamic aspect >of groove templates - ie, the template imposed not >only position, but velocity information. I found >this extremely useful. > >Is this gone from Logic altogether? Seems like >a very easy feature to implement. Perhaps it was >dropped to allow compatability with DNA? > >If I've just missed it, would someone please clue me >in. > >big thanks > >Brett > >_____________________________ >Brett Stewart >Mapenzi Music >brett@m... >http:/www.mapenzi.com >_____________________________ > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 14:11:08 -0700 > From: "Steve Catanzaro" <stevencatanzaro@s...> >Subject: Hard drive and sloppy timing glitches > >Hey all. Just installed a new 10gig hard drive and transferred all my audio >files over to it. It's a Maxtor EIDE and I just went ahead and did the >recommented install viz. partitioning and what not. > >Now, however, playing back 4 tracks of audio (from Yamaha DS2416) I'm >getting intermittent little stops and stutters in LAW. The hard drive says >it has a 9 ms access time. Does anything else need to be done >optimization-wise to make the system more efficient? Thanks > >Steve > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Marcus <fritzsch@b...> >To: <logic-users@onelist.com> >Sent: Saturday, September 11, 1999 9:27 AM >Subject: Re: [LUG] Assigning real faders to MIDI control data > > >> From: Marcus <fritzsch@b...> >> >> >From: "Jeehun Hwang" <jeehun@d...> >> > >> >Paolo (or anybody), >> > >> >I'm still not quite sure how this works... >> > >> >For instance, my controller keyboard is a K2500XS which has 8 (A-H) >> >assignable controllers (faders) on the board. How do I get Logic to >learn >> >which physical fader I want to use to control various MIDI data? (i.e. >from >> >something as simple as using the faders to control volume change for >> >different tracks - instruments, channels, etc. - to more complex >assignments >> >such as real-time controlling/recording of various modulation, filter, >> >envelope, and other values for a single instrument) >> > >> >I'm still new to LA & environments, guys... Bear with me. >> > >> >Thanks. >> > >> >JH >> > >> >> >> Hi Jeehun, >> >> I'm controlling faders and the like from my mixing console. It works great >and the benefit is awesome. >> To set this up, I'd recommend You to do the following steps: >> >> 1. connect Your Master keyboard or MidiFaderBox to Your Midi interface >(i.e.,. Modem, interface port3) >> >> 2. Configure that device, that it actually sends Midi data (some Midi >interfaces show incoming midi data with a flashing LED) >> >> 3. open Your environment in Logic, the layer with the physical input >object- and sequencer object.(If those don't exist yet, You have to create >them). Now patch the sum output of the input object to the sequencer object. >> >> 4. create a monitor object and connect a cable from the physical input >object (i.e.,. M3; modem port3). >> move Your fader and You should see arriving midi data in the monitor >object. If You want that midi data to arrive in the sequencer itself, You >simply connect the output of the monitor to the sequencer object. that's >all. >> >> 5. You can patch all kinds of transformers between physical input object >and monitor object to modify the data. >> >> 6. select a track in Logic and start fadin' >> >> >> Hope this helps, >> >> >> >> Marcus >> musician >> >> http://www.synchron.de/bos >> >> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- >> >> ATTN ONELIST USERS: stay current on the latest activities, >> programs, & features at ONElist by joining our member newsletter at >> <a href=" http://www.onelist.com/subscribe/onelist_announce ">Click</a> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:11:03 +0200 > From: Christian Obermaier <ChristianObermaier@c...> >Subject: RE: VST Plug-ins > >Hi Jeehun > >>My folder name IS exactly VstPlugIns > >ok > >>but both 'Premiere' and 'Audiosuite' menus >>just say 'no plug-ins available' when I look inside. > >Sure, as you probably don't have any. > >>I'm assuming that both of those plug-ins require >>either separate hardware or software that I need >>to buy > >Yes. The actual premiere or audiosuite plugins, that is. > >>If that's the case, does it mean that unless I get >>either of those, I won't be able to use the VST Plug-Ins >>that came with LAP? > >No. We are dealing with four different types of native processed plugins here. > >Type 1. VST > >The VST-plugin standard was invented by Steinberg, whereby VST is an acronym (whether it stands for Virtual Studio Technology or Very Strange Timing is still unclear). Logic on Mac is able to handle that sort of plugins quite nicely. Logic on Windows is not, apparently because Emagic has no license from Steinberg to implement a VST-host in LAW. The Amulet VST adapter seems to overcome this to a degree. I have no idea, ask the pc guys. > >On the mac you put them into the VstPlugIns folder which has to be inside logic's program folder, and from there on you can access them as *nondestructive realtime fx* from every audio fader's insert points. > >There are a lot of good and a lot of bad or just boring ones (why would you want to install a 6db HiPass when the program itself has loads of them already) around. Tons of them free or as shareware on the net. > > >Type 2. Premiere > >This is a standard defined by Adobe who first implemented it in their video editing program Premiere and differs quite a bit from VST. > >-It is destructive. This means that any settings you make will be calculated into the actual audiofile and stay there forever. Good - only processed once, cpu free thereafter, Bad - no return (besides the immediate Undo), what if settings turn out be too extreme three days later ? >-You can only hear a more or less short preview to test settings, and this preview is solo, without context. >-The preview is 'hardpatched' thru the Soundmanager i.e.. a completely different output. Surely doesn't make things easier (you can reroute the Soundmanager to f.ex. the AW8 though). > >Why bother Premiere then ? > >-Because certain plugs (Ionizer comes to mind) don't exist at all as VST because they need a significant time to analyze the material. In other words are designed to be offline processes. >-Because you will want to cancel some amplifier hum in a recording only once in a destructive process up front and not waste precious cpu power later on. > >Premiere plugins are put into the Premiere Plug-Ins (correct naming is again crucial) folder which has to be inside logic's program folder, and from there on you can access them as *destructive offline fx* from the sample editor. > > >Type 3. Audiosuite. > >Basically the same as Premiere, besides that it is designed to run with digidesign hardware and DAE. > > >Type 4. Logic's internal fx > >Actually these are not (yet) plugins from a software user's point of view, because you can't just buy and plug them into your program as you would do with VST or Premiere plugins. >Still they are plugins in the sense that you can plug them into your signal path once you have the desire to do so. Certainly our software nerds could go into minutely details as to what extent they are plugins from a programmers view. >However, to the user they are invisible outside logic. No folder, no delay file, no nothing. All contained inside the application itself. No plugin piracy. Period. >All of logic's plugins are available as *nondestructive realtime fx* from every audio fader's insert points and as *'constructive' realtime fx* once you decide to Bounce any audio with its fx from an Audio Output Object. > > > >Because software manufacturers are clever, many plugins come in different breeds, so you can use a Waves Q10 equalizer via its VST-shell as a realtime plugin or with its Premiere-shell as a non-realtime plugin. >Think of the shells as adapters like the one you plug your razor in once you find yourself in a hotel room in Cairo. > >Everything clear ? > > >Christian > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:10:21 +0100 > From: BLANC CYRIL <blanc.cyril@w...> >Subject: LAP MAC L2, ULTRA ATA, ATA, SCSI, ULTRA SCSI and FIREWIRE !!! > >Hello, > > Can somebody explain to me the influence on an L2 cache on LAP. >(does the L2 cache improve CPU or disk I/O or both) > > Also an explanation in term of speed of the differences on ULTRA >ATA, ATA, ULTRA SCSI, SCSI and FIREWIRE will be welcome > > Can you plug on an ULTRA SCSI PCI port an AKAI S2000, a Yamaha 4416 >and an SCSI scanner? > > If you have a G4 at 500MHZ with 250 MHZ L2 cache or a G4 at 450 MHZ >with 225 MHZ L2 cache or a G4 at 400 MHZ with 200 L2 cache will you have >the same DISK I/O speed ? > > If I have part of the audio of a song on one ULTRA ATA disk and the >rest on another ULTRA ATA disk will you have more tracks than having all >you audio track on the same disk. > > If instead of using the audio port on the Mac I buy an audio card >will that improve the number of track and the number of effects > > Please use simple English as my mother thong is French > >-- >Cyril Blanc > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > >mailto:blanc.cyril@w... >92350 Plessis Robinson France > >Need a drummer or some music please e-mail >My speciality is orchestral film music, small price > >Besoin d'un batteur ou de musique sur mesure ; envoyez moi un e-mail >Ma spécialitÃÂ&Ac irc;© est la création de musique symphonique pour les films à >petit prix > >Studio : AKAI S2000 - Proteus 1, 2 and Vintage - Yamaha TG500, DX7 et >RX11, Korg Ex800 - Roland D110, JV1080, S550 - 2 Mixer, Frontier 24x8X2 >and Yamaha Promix 01 18x2 - Effect DSP128 Digitec - MAC G3 with Studio 4 >Midi interface - Software LOGIC AUDIO PLATINIUM - Ludwig long lugs drums >- Zildjan cymbals >------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:11:43 +0200 > From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@f...> >Subject: Re: OT: 64bit os > >> >There is a 64bit Windows due out next year along with a 64 bit chip, >Merced, >> >from Intel which is supposedly 20-30 times faster than current >processors! >> >> Be aware that, as of last report, Windows 2000 won't actually boot on a >> Merced; it looks like the first OS on Merced will be Linux, which is >actually >> not surprising. >> >> Anyway, Microsoft has made it fairly clear that their ports to 64-bit >CPU's >> will still be just like their 32-bit systems for a fair while; too much of >> MS's code does Bad Things if you try to run it native on a 64-bit CPU. >This >> is why Compaq dropped support for NT/Alpha. > >Microsoft is working hard actually to support the Merced Chip, with a >special version of Win 2000 in 64 bits !!!!!! > > >regards, > >hans > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:18:14 +0200 > From: "Hans Van Even" <hve@f...> >Subject: Re: This whole Midi Timing thing!! > >> Hi, >> I'm in the midst of putting together a home studio based around a PC, >Paris, >> and Logic (the PC is being built, and should be here soon, I hope). But >this >> Midi timing thing I see everywhere is making me worry. Timing is a bit >> crucial when it comes to music, right? Is everyone having trouble? I had >been >> using an Atari 1040ST (!!!), and never had any trouble. How can you make >> music if your timing is off? >> > >Yes , you're right , I'm waiting for my version and I'm a bit worry about >this too. With Cakewalk I've never had any problems of this kind . > >Au revoir, > >Hans > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:06:16 +0100 > From: "Mat Jarvis" <mat@m...> >Subject: Re: Bits and Logic > >Mostly yes > > >> From: "Steve Catanzaro" <stevencatanzaro@s...> >> >> Is it true that LAW 3.6 is only a 16 bit program? >> > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 11 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:44:00 +0100 > From: dirosa@l... >Subject: Re: Digest Number 49 > >Ron Bommele: said >>I've read somewhere it's best for (digital) quality to use the final >>mastering sample rate (so that would be 44.1kHz) from initial recording thru >>mastering. Unfortunately this project started off at 48kHz on a DA-88 tape >>that currently shows potential for drop-outs :-( >Paolo Tramannoni: >I disagree. I prefer to work at the higher resolution, and then use a >reliable tool for doing my sample rate conversion. Logic seems to do a very >good job (anyone else has experience with it?). > >yes logics SRC is ok , but : >it is true that if you stay in 44.1 from beginning to end is better ! >48 KHz is mainly used for film /TV sound, and if you have to SRC , you >definately loose something! >It is often even wiser to play it out analog and resample at 44.1, but >logic (prosoniq) does a good job. >ciao > > >http://www.dubbing.de/origin >origin@d... >http://www.luda.it/people/origin > > > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 12 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:42:47 +0200 > From: "Ron Bommele" <rbommele@w...> >Subject: Re: RE:LAMG 4.0.2 - Sample rating advice needed > > >>>Should I play safe and use 48kHz in Logic but master via the analog >>>output of the Spirit Mixer to DAT at 44.1kHz? >> >> This is what i would suggest. Be aware that logic's ASIO doesn't like >> 48kHz, i'm not sure whether it's involved with the STUDI/O. >> > >When you look in the Audio Window > Options there clearly is a choice >between 44.1kHz and 48kHz. Why do you say that ASIO doesn't like 48kHz then? > >Any comments from Emagic on using 48kHz sample rate in combination with a >Sonorus STUDI/O card; any preference in using ASIO or STUDIO drivers within >Logic for this? > > >Ron Bommelé >The Netherlands > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 13 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:09:45 +0200 > From: "Yoonchi" <r.g.jonis@s...> >Subject: Re: Rubbish MIDI Timing > >>From: flynn@l... >> >>Hi All, >> >>This is yet another plea for help with my Logic MIDI timing probelm >>which I've had for 2 years with asolutley no resolution. ><<snip>> >>I even went as far as purchasing 2 Unitor 8 Mk2's as they are supposed >>to give as good MIDI timing as hardware sequencers. ><<snip>> >>This is what I have done to try to cure it. >> >>1) Paired down all extensions. >>2) Turned off all Chase and Catch functions >>3) Downgraded my OS back to MacOS 8.5, 8.1 and 8.0 >>4) Tested the E0Synth with an external sequencer. It is rock solid with >>an Akai MPC2000 >>5) Experimented with the various settings int he compatability sub-menu. >>Makes no difference. >>6) Tried the E-Synth in various MIDI ports . No Difference >>7) Tried the Unitor in Modem, Printer and USB mode. No difference. >>8) Threatening Logic...didn't work! :) >>9) Made sure MIDI clock wasn't being transmitted >>10) Got drunk. > >Two things come to mind: >1) Are you using OMS? >2) What version of Logic are you using? >I'm not an expert in this field on a Mac, but I'd say somthing either in the >environment or the printer port is not functioning well. Could also be a >driver for somthing you use through the printer port, like a librairian or >editor. >Just some guesses, >Yoonchi. > > > > >@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > ¥ð ;ðnÂÂÂ&c opy;hí > > "Change has always come from small minorities." > Robert Fripp, 1980 > > http://victorian.fortunecity.com/pinter/438/ > http://noten.nl.fortunecity.com/jazz/8/ > >@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 14 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 21:26:14 +0200 > From: "Yoonchi" <r.g.jonis@s...> >Subject: Re: WISH: iterative quantise for audio > >>From: "Mat Jarvis" <mat@m...> >> >>Subject says it all really > >And how did you imagine that? Please elaborate. No more re-recording >nowadays anymore? >I guess no one can play an instrument nowadays anymore, :-). How about >practice. >Comping, >Yoonchi. > > > >@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > ¥ð ;ðnÂÂÂ&c opy;hí > > "Change has always come from small minorities." > Robert Fripp, 1980 > > http://victorian.fortunecity.com/pinter/438/ > http://noten.nl.fortunecity.com/jazz/8/ > >@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 15 > Date: 11 Sep 1999 22:32:45 -0000 > From: j_bowers@s... >Subject: want to " hardwire " fader box to protools tracks - input pleeze? > >Hi all - > >I recently purchased a Peavey PC1600X hardware midi fader box. I'd like to " hardwire " it in Logic's enviroment so that it will always control my protools audio tracks and ONLY my audio tracks! I currently run it like this: > >physical in -> sequencer >and >physical in -> PC1600x -> channel splitter ->all 16 audio tracks. > >this is working ok, but still effects any track instrument I have selected in the arrange window. I think the way to do this would be to insert a transformer between the physical in -> sequencer connection that would filter out any signals from the PC1600X ( on port 8 ). But I am not much of a logician ( in spite of my program of choice ), and have no idea how I would set the transformer up... > >anyone know if I'm barking up the right tree, and how I would set it up? > >any insights greatly appreciated. > >peace - Jamie B. > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 16 > Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 00:13:53 +0100 > From: "b...." <BK@r...> >Subject: Calling ISIS card users > >Has anyone successfully installed the driver and software updates available >on the Guillemot site (Windows 98) .Thanks. If the answer is yes I'll >probably ask for more advice! > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 17 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:32:17 -0500 > From: "James" <star5k@h...> >Subject: repeated notes > >I get two notes sounding whenever i press one key, how am i supposed to >aviod this? I get one from the keyboard, and one from the midi data looping >thru the computer back into my keyboard. I have a k2500 and I'm just >starting to use logic. > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 18 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:43:26 -0700 > From: "shiftaling" <xenox@w...> >Subject: Re: repeated notes > >yeah, thats supposed to happen. when you have a midi channel (not audio) >selected and you press a key two things happen... 1. your synth sends out >the audio signal which goes to your soundcard and out your speakers >(basically) and 2. your synth sends out MIDI data which goes to logic. > >when you have the midi channel selected Logic will play the midi note (it >should say what instrument is selected).... thus you hear the audio and midi >output. > >if you dont like that, when recording midi, turn the volume ALL the way down >on your synth, and then back up for audio > >good luck with logic, im just a newbie too ;-) > >--jeff > >-----Original Message----- >From: James <star5k@h...> >To: logic-users@onelist.com <logic-users@onelist.com> >Date: Saturday, September 11, 1999 4:33 PM >Subject: [LUG] repeated notes > > >>From: "James" <star5k@h...> >> >>I get two notes sounding whenever i press one key, how am i supposed to >>aviod this? I get one from the keyboard, and one from the midi data looping >>thru the computer back into my keyboard. I have a k2500 and I'm just >>starting to use logic. >> >>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- >> >>Congratulations to MSers_Online. Our latest ONElist of the Week. >>For full story and to submit yours, go to >><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/ootw25 ">Click Here</a> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 19 > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:04:49 -0400 > From: "Rick Barse" <wickeys@e...> >Subject: Re: repeated notes > >James writes: > >> >> I get two notes sounding whenever i press one key, how am i supposed to >> aviod this? I get one from the keyboard, and one from the midi data >looping >> thru the computer back into my keyboard. I have a k2500 and I'm just >> starting to use logic. >> > >"Local Off" on your synth. Your K2500 manual should explain how to do it. >When you turn Local Off, then Logic plays your synth. Right now, you've got >both the synth and Logic doing it. > >Yours in Kensington, > >Rick Barse >wickeys@e... > > > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 20 > Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 10:30:47 +0930 > From: Sound Incarnate <soundincarnate@a...> >Subject: VST plugin limit > >Hey Emagic, can you do something about the amount of VST plugins available >in the plug in list? > >I had the scare of my life, when I installed QuadraFuzz and then was missing >a few Waves plugins. When I took quadra fuzz out - my missing waves plugin >re-appeared. To test this out, I put in another 3 vst plugins, and my last >3 plugins in the list disappeared. Took the 3 VST plugins back out, they >re-appeared. > >Will the plugin # be increased in future versions? Is there a reason for >its limit? I thought I was ram-dependant. > >Cheers > >George > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 21 > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:11:09 +0700 > From: Bill Trikojus <billyt@a...> >Subject: Re: burning mono files > >Try converting in Soundapp > >Scott Price wrote: > >> From: cpmusic@t... (Scott Price) >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I have a bunch of mono mixes from a TV series that I want to burn onto CD, >> but they have to be AIFF stereo for my software (Discribe). I've tried all >> kinds of things in the audio window such as copying and renaming with (L) >> and (R), convert to AIFF stereo (which needs to see a split stereo file), >> etc., nothing seems to work. >> >> Any clues? >> >> thanks, >> >> Scott >> >> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- >> >> Looking for MP3's? LISTEN.COM is your guide to online music. >> Find your favorite artists and discover new music you'll love. >> Start your MP3 search at http://www.listen.com/go.jsp?1music1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 22 > Date: 12 Sep 1999 01:26:39 -0000 > From: joelindsey@e... >Subject: More on Audio Tempo Change. > >I noticed a few post about changing the tempo of audio files w/ strip silence... >jusy wanted to add that (if you have recycle) you can open a file, set the >desired tempo in the "new tempo" box along with the sensitivity and stretch, >choose "transmit as one sample"from the sampler menu and then use "open slices in >new windows" and a time-strched version be created. Just save it out and bring it >into Logic. This is useful if you don't want to send all the individual slices to >a sampler just to change the tempo, or take up sampler memory. > >Also this seems to work only with Recycle 1.7 and not 1.6. > >Hope I'm telling someone something they didn't already know. > >Joe Lindsey > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 23 > Date: Sun, 12 Sep 99 11:49:35 +0930 > From: Darrel Merritt <dnanet@p...> >Subject: G4 Stealth Serial Port > > >This snippet from MacInTouch (www.macintouch.com) might interest >prospective G4 owners: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > GeeThree's Bruce Gee sent in an update regarding the Stealth Serial >Port > and Apple's G4 systems: > > "We anticipate that the existing Stealth Serial Port should work fine >with > the 400MHz G4 (based on Yosemite board). We anxiously awaiting arrival >of > a machine on backorder to do more extensive testing ourselves, but do >not > expect any problems. Since this configuration comes with an internal > modem, this will need to be removed. We've also added a little >animation > on our site for folks that want to see how to remove the modem > <http://www.geethree.com/remove.html>;. > > "For the Sawtooth G4 machines, it will require a new version of the > Stealth Serial Port. There is a bit of information about the internal > modem on these machines, and it is clear that it is different from the > Blue G3. We're investigating the technical feasibility of a Sawtooth > version and will update you as things progress." > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 24 > Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 04:26:11 +0200 > From: "Tomer Morad" <morad@i...> >Subject: Re: Use of the subject line > >Hi, > >Does the [LUG] in the subject line annoy only me, or do others think that >also? IMO It should not be added automatically in the subject line. > >Tomer. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Paolo Tramannoni <p.tram@f...> >To: <logic-users@onelist.com> >Sent: Saturday, September 11, 1999 5:25 PM >Subject: [LUG] Use of the subject line > > >> From: Paolo Tramannoni <p.tram@f...> >> >> Hello Luggers, >> >> I suggest to use the Subject line for a short, professional, description >of >> the matter you will discuss in your message (something like "Problems >> creating an audio track"). I tend to delete any message with a subject >like >> "Please!!!!!!!!!!!", because it doesn't inform me on what I will find in >> it, and I don't like to be surprised. >> >> We are a lot of people, and I guess we can't read all, but only what we >can >> answer too, or are interested to. I (and many of us) use this list for a >> professional reason, so I hope we can use it in a professonal way. >> >> Paolo >> >> >> Paolo Tramannoni >> Via M.L.King, 6/A - 62017 Porto Recanati (Mc) - Italy >> Phone: +39-071-7591268 - 0347-8177569 - Fax: +39-071-7591268 >> E-Mail: p.tram@f... - tramannoni@k... >> >> >> >> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- >> >> Show your ONElist SPIRIT! >> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/tshirt2 ">Click Here</a> >> With a new ONElist SHIRT available through our website. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >Message: 25 > Date: Sun, 12 Sep 99 12:01:10 +0930 > From: Darrel Merritt <dnanet@p...> >Subject: G4 gPort / iMate compatibility > >>From <http://i.macland.net/i-news/news/990911-004.shtml>; > > Griffin Technology, Inc. has announced compatibility between the new > PowerMac G4/400 computers from Apple and their iMate, USB to ADB >adapter > as well as their gPort, universal serial and Localtalk adapter. The >iMate > adapter is also compatible with the iBook and the forthcoming PowerMac > G4/450s and G4/500s that use the Sawtooth motherboard. Griffin will >ship a > compatible version of the gPort for the PowerMac G4/450 and G4/500 >models > at about the same time as the new Sawtooth G4s ship. > > >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ >________________________________________________________________________ ___ ____ > >