Message: 7 Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 12:58:47 -0000 From: peter@... Subject: LAWP: Just one interim fix 'release audio in background' I have no problem in waiting until january but in the meantime could they just fix 'release audio in background' so I can use Sound Forge. I SECOND THIRD FOURTH AND FIFTH this one!!!! ,I've occasionally raised the "release audio"problem on the list and reported it to Emagic but an answer has not been forthcoming either as to why it happens, possible solutions (if there are any) or what the future prospects are. As far as Logic 5 is concerned, when it's ready ,it's ready and I'll wait till then, I'm sure it'll be worth the wait, it always is!!! Cheers all Dave Abbott Johannesburg ,South Africa

I've no doubt everyone has their own pet feature addition, and the whole V5 list looks pretty tasty to me. IMO new features should definitely be left until V5 is good and ready, although I'd add my support for the 'release audio' fix. My real concern however is platform support, which I have no doubt Emagic are watching closely as well. Maybe it's just people I know and work with, but I get the impression there's currently a mass-exodus from Win98/ME, all moving over to Windows 2000 and eventually WinXP. I'm very much amongst this group and now looking very hard at Nuendo as a result. Win2000 support as an interim update would not only be hugely welcome from a user perspective, but might also ensure that Logic maintains it's position at No.1 amongst producers who feel that Win2K is now the only way to go. In short, I'll happily wait for new devices, features, audio instruments, automation etc., if Logic as it currently stands could run on Win2K. Jules PS. That DSP card latency fix would also be pretty welcome - seems to be taking an awfully long time. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Abbott" <cricket@...> To: <logic-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: [LUG] Re LAWP: Just one interim fix 'release audio in background' > > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 12:58:47 -0000 > From: peter@... > Subject: LAWP: Just one interim fix 'release audio in background' > > I have no problem in waiting until january but in the meantime could > they just fix 'release audio in background' so I can use Sound Forge. > > > I SECOND THIRD FOURTH AND FIFTH this one!!!! ,I've occasionally raised the > "release audio"problem on the list and reported it to Emagic but an answer > has not been forthcoming either as to why it happens, possible solutions (if > there are any) or what the future prospects are. As far as Logic 5 is > concerned, when it's ready ,it's ready and I'll wait till then, I'm sure > it'll be worth the wait, it always is!!! > > Cheers all > > Dave Abbott > Johannesburg ,South Africa > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > >>>>> Subject lines must contain: [LAM]/[LAW]/[GEN]/[OT] <<<<< > > FAQ: http://www.logicuser.net > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >

>Win2000 support as an interim update would not only be hugely >welcome from a user perspective, but might also ensure that Logic maintains >it's position at No.1 amongst producers who feel that Win2K is now the only >way to go. I dont want to anounce anything over here, but no one told it would not be possible to release a win2k compatible Logic which is not 5.0 :) So much so far... With greetings from Germany Sascha Kujawa Quality Assurance Manager and Betatest Coordinator (Windows) Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH

Thanks Sascha I appreciate you can't make guarantees, but at least this keeps the hope alive! :) This is a fairly big deal for quite alot of us, so a pre-5.0 Win2K version would be fantastic news. Jules ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sascha Kujawa" <skujawa@...> To: <logic-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:44 PM Subject: Re: [LUG] Re LAWP: Just one interim fix 'release audio in background' (and Win2K support) > > >Win2000 support as an interim update would not only be hugely > >welcome from a user perspective, but might also ensure that Logic maintains > >it's position at No.1 amongst producers who feel that Win2K is now the only > >way to go. > > I dont want to anounce anything over here, but no one told it would > not be possible to release a win2k compatible Logic which is not 5.0 :) > So much so far... > > > With greetings from Germany > > Sascha Kujawa > Quality Assurance Manager and > Betatest Coordinator (Windows) > Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > >>>>> Subject lines must contain: [LAM]/[LAW]/[GEN]/[OT] <<<<< > > FAQ: http://www.logicuser.net > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >

A quick question to those in the know : will existing vst and vsti plugins run on Win2k or does one need vsti and vst fx that are specially designed for Win 2k ? I am wondering about this because I would not want to move over to Win2K only to learn that all my beloved plugins don't work anymore. But the again the point will come when 98 / Me becomes obsolete - so what is the likely future here ? anyone ? Cheers - D! ----- Original Message ----- From: Sascha Kujawa <skujawa@...> To: <logic-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:44 AM Subject: Re: [LUG] Re LAWP: Just one interim fix 'release audio in background' (and Win2K support) > > I dont want to anounce anything over here, but no one told it would > not be possible to release a win2k compatible Logic which is not 5.0 :) > So much so far... > > > With greetings from Germany > > Sascha Kujawa > Quality Assurance Manager and > Betatest Coordinator (Windows) > Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH

Hi, I'm new in here, so excuse me if this is naive: Does that mean that a 4.8 update for LAWP is likely to bring soon some extra-sunshine in our lives of happy LAW users, with more AudioInstr and FX in our LSO's? In one word: Is it a good idea to order _now_ the dual CPU card I planned to buy in early 2002... Thank you, and thanks to all. Pascal J. -- In logic-users@y..., Sascha Kujawa <skujawa@m...> wrote: > > >Win2000 support as an interim update would not only be hugely > >welcome from a user perspective, but might also ensure that Logic maintains > >it's position at No.1 amongst producers who feel that Win2K is now the only > >way to go. > > I dont want to anounce anything over here, but no one told it would > not be possible to release a win2k compatible Logic which is not 5.0 :) > So much so far... > > > With greetings from Germany > > Sascha Kujawa > Quality Assurance Manager and > Betatest Coordinator (Windows) > Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH

>Is it a good idea to order _now_ the dual CPU card I planned to buy One important question is: what exactly do you expect from a dual CPU system? With greetings from Germany Sascha Kujawa Quality Assurance Manager and Betatest Coordinator (Windows) Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH

Hi Sascha and list:) I'm expecting to be able to use more VSTintr and Logic effects. I use Battery in all my songs, along with B4, EVP88 (Sometimes REAKTOR, but it's unstable and takes 15 to 20 % of CPU, so I often bounce quickly to .wav). If I add say 10-15 eq, comps or filters, I can hardly add a platinum verb: then the driver's unable to process all data in time... So I guess this is only a matter of CPU power... So, what I'm expecting is to be able to keep my midi tracks and effects editable until the final mixdown. The only solution I have now is to bounce all(most of) my midi instr tracks and heavy-FXed audio tracks into new .wav and start a new mix session with a clear "AudioConfiguration" window, ya know with no blue button lit. Please, tell me what you think of that expectation:) Thanks Pascal J. ----- MY system LAWP 4.6.2 WIN98 2nd ed PIII 1000eb 512 RAM MRE digi PST, latest driver scsi atlas HD 10K 18GB - controller 19160 IDE drive, CCDburner, etc. I think I have a cheap jetway motherboard. Is that important? ----------------------- -- In logic-users@y..., Sascha Kujawa <skujawa@m...> wrote: > > >Is it a good idea to order _now_ the dual CPU card I planned to buy > > One important question is: > what exactly do you expect from a dual CPU system? > > > With greetings from Germany > > Sascha Kujawa > Quality Assurance Manager and > Betatest Coordinator (Windows) > Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH

>I'm expecting to be able to use more VSTintr and Logic effects. >So I guess this is only a matter of CPU power... >Please, tell me what you think of that expectation:) If you really need more CPU power, you should get a faster single CPU. Sascha Kujawa Quality Assurance Manager and Betatest Coordinator (Windows) Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH