jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 3441 of 105756 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Thomas Whitmore" <thomasw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 at 12:00:02 AM
Subject: Re: RAID HARD DRIVE
Message #5485
Hi Lance, >IMPORTANT NOTE: It is critical to have matched drives for best >performance. This means that all the physical details of the disks >should be the same, not just the drive size. Number of platters, seek >time, etc. Yep, it is much more efficient distributing tasks between drives if they all perform exactly the same. >An example of a nice solution with the FastTrak card is 4 drives. >You can then stripe the drives in pairs and then set one pair to mirror >the other for redundancy. [Gives 26 gig of storage, factor 2 write speed compared to single drive] >Of course you could also stripe all 4 drives together for one really >large drive. [Gives 52 gig, factor 4 write speed] How about RAID 5, using just one drive's worth of storage for redundancy? You get 39 gig of storage, no data loss or work stoppage should a drive fail, and write speeds ranging from factor 2 to 3 depending on how smart the controller is with bulk data. Cheers, Thomas
Viewed 319 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.