Maybe you are aware of the numeral new kinds of notation, like proportionaland symbolic notationtechnics that is used in modern music. All these technics offer a musical language that goes far beyond the average computer-inspired composer ( as far as I have seen till now afcourse ). This offers a complete different view on the musical language, most sequencers are even not capable to use these possibilities. Every system we use in Logic for example is based on rather oldfashioned musicsystems. (nothing wrong with thatby the way).So I think it is a mistake to see all computer-related composing as the ultimate development in music. There is more going on! Bob -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: BastoBerlin@... <BastoBerlin@...> Aan: logic-users@egroups.com <logic-users@egroups.com> Datum: dinsdag 1 augustus 2000 17:58 Onderwerp: Re: [LUG] Triplets: What are they exactly? >In einer eMail vom 01.08.00 15:56:43 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt >bhelsloot@...: > ><< It is always imposible to speak of superiority in artforms. A merely want >to suggest that any higher level of musical achievment in a complex artform >will always be synchronised with a greath knowledge of the art itself. The >result afcource is never a guaranty for a masterpiece. Interesting discussion >anyway, don't you think? Besides, why visualy dominated? writing means >passing through knowledge and interpretation, that's what we are doing here. >>> > >What I mean is that we are thinking and making music to much using the >european notation categories. The computer is a new possibility to overgo >those categories. >basto > >Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com >