|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
From: Tony Maxwell <tony@...>
>What I found appealing about the BeOS was exactly this idea of a custom
OS
>dedicated to the program. Just as stand-alone hard-disk recorders,
samplers
>and synths have their own OSs, Logic and other programs could have used
Be
>as something approaching a proprietary OS, designed specifically to run
the
>program alone. Taking this idea to extremes, programs such as Logic
could
>come bundled with their own OS (isn't that just another description of
>various hard-disk recorders?) - but I realise that this will probably
never
>happen due to the complexity and costs/relative to market size of
building
>an OS that can run a full-fledged computer.
That's precisely what Be is saying! Their whole marketing point is
that stand-alone "appliances" are where the money is (they point
to
the VS-880 as an example in our industry, and to the DVD iMac as a
general public example).
Of course, there's also the small potential matter of there being
little money in a "media OS"...
In any case, all we really want is low latency host-based audio, and
that's also starting to happen under other operating systems. Extreme
efficiency may not be such a big deal as computers get faster.
Or am I wrong?
___
Nick Batzdorf, editor - Recording magazine
The magazine for the recording musician
www.Recordingmag.com. editorial: US 818/905-9101, fax -5434
subscriptions, address changes: 800/582-8326, 281/261-2581
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |